/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>29908118
because ETH was always meant to be a beta testnet. a v.1.0

>>29908118
neutral bridge currency =/= gas token. solve et coagula fren

>>29201764
that's really interesting. so, rather than getting him to get rid of his XRP as fast as possible, they're following more of a tightly planned timeline.

this of course feeds into the narrative that Jed and Ripple are actually working together and that their dispute is, on some level at least, theater

>>29201900
chainlink...now that's a name i haven't seen mentioned in these threads in a long time. remember in the first 100 threads or so when they were trying to push some kind of conflict between Link and XRP? imo its because Link was the trial run for the /xsg/ ARG, where 4chan autists who are able to connect dots and see patterns were able to get rich if they were persistent, sort of like a schizo-NEET Motley Fool

the smarter and more successful Linkies have now diversified into more useful assets, like XRP and Lamborghinis with pictures of anime girls on them

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bancor
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bretton_Woods_system
https://web.archive.org/web/20150923201757/http://www.centerforneweconomics.org/documents/copy-e-f-schumacher-multilateral-clearing-economica-new-series-vol-10-no-38-may-1943-pp-15
https://www.imf.org/en/News/Articles/2020/10/15/sp101520-a-new-bretton-woods-moment

Found this on Twitter, but I don't understand what they mean about the buy back

>>25204383

>>25180564
>things don't look great for it right now
you sound awfully normal, friend. are you sure you're in the right place? you might be more comfortable in one of the 4-6 XRP FUD threads which are permanently being created. Round these parts we tend to believe strongly in the ultimate truth of the fact that XRP will be valued at two thousand dollars per token by the end of the year, though we tend to disagree on which calendar.

I saw something in another thread that spoke to me- it said that the plans of the elite don't proceed according to date, but rather chains of events. That is, things are going to happen, but the dates aren't set in stone, because in order for thing B to happen, thing A has to happen first.

I feel like Ripple's adoption as the backbone of the digital economy is, at this point, a certainty. I have been convinced especially by Ripple's very powerful partners in the financial authorities of G7 and supranational organizations, and witnessing the cross-border payment and remittance corridors being laid down via corporate partnerships in places like Mexico, Philippines, and Saudi Arabia. It seems certain that XRP will be used to transmit value, and in order to do that effectively, it has to be worth anywhere from 10x to 5,000x what it is worth right now, depending on the side of the market share it captures initially.

The question is, what obstacles lie between institutional adoption and use of XRP as a settlement instrument, and one of the last major ones is institutional clarity on the part of the US Government (specifically the SEC- the DOJ and FinCen have already ruled that XRP is a currency) and the lawsuit that was filed will conveniently provide that clarity if it is ruled in Ripple's favor- or if it is dropped (by consent of 3/5 SEC commissioners) before it ever goes to court.

So, friend, I appreciate your healthy skepticism and share your ambivalence towards the True Believer mindset.

>>25168219
i imagine there will be quite a demand, perhaps we will organize OTC sales direct to institutions. I think Flare is going to be bigger than any of us can properly imagine right now.

Another theory (see pic related) is that there will be a buyback.

>>25158512
in my opinion it is a huge and well-coordinated campaign to get retail investors to sell their XRP before its adoption as the supranational bridge currency between digital assets, to the point where i wonder if Clayton's filing the SEC lawsuit wasn't actually coordinated in order to FUD normies and transfer XRP from the hands of small holders to institutions.

See, the fewer XRP that are held by non-institutional investors, the more stable the currency will be, presumably. also, presumably schizo XRP billionaires like us will pose a threat to the NWO/great reset and they don't want that.

this is why I am spending my Christmas autistically posting about how Ripple is going to win their lawsuit and why XSG readers shouldn't sell their XRP: because I want us schizos to play a part in shaping the coming world, and if we sell then we won't be as influential.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bancor

>>25132925
Ripple has been planned since the original Bretton Woods conference, when it was proposed by the IMF's head economists, James Maynard Keynes and EF Schumacher, and called the "Bancor"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bancor

(pic related)
This was perceived as too progressive, so it was replaced by the XDR or Special Drawing Rights, essentially the IMF's gross settlement instrument composed of a basket of currencies. XRP (note the similarity between XRP and XRP, (and XLM)) will replace the XDR as IMF financial instrument and usher in the age of digital finance and one world government.

This represents the last and best opportunity to secure generational wealth for you and your descendants. If you don't buy XRP XLM and ALGO (but especially XRP) right now, you will regret it for the rest of your life.

https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bancor

>>25122334
Here is the pic baba posted, looking for big brained anons here