[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]

/biz/ - Business & Finance

Search:


View post   

>> No.17077381 [View]
File: 181 KB, 1405x728, MultiVAC vs ETH 2.0.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17077381

>>17076706
>>17076732
MultiVAC CTO was asked about ETH 2.0 in an interview and stated the following:

>Ethereum 2.0 chose to be compatible with too many previous features like the account model, some features of the contracts, etc
>This harms ETH's future sharding
>MultiVAC doesn't use the beacon chain structure from the beginning
>Different MTV shards can process the data asynchronously in a parallel way.
>MultiVAC's scalability and flexibility are better

>> No.17065942 [View]
File: 181 KB, 1405x728, MultiVAC vs ETH 2.0.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17065942

>>17065702
>>17065724
Regarding Ethereum, MultiVAC CTO was asked about ETH 2.0 in an interview and stated the following:

>Ethereum 2.0 chose to be compatible with too many previous features like the account model, some features of the contracts, etc
>This harms ETH's future sharding
>MultiVAC doesn't use the beacon chain structure from the beginning
>Different MTV shards can process the data asynchronously in a parallel way.
>MultiVAC's scalability and flexibility are better.

>> No.16662404 [View]
File: 181 KB, 1405x728, MultiVAC vs ETH 2.0.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16662404

>>16662320
MultiVAC CTO was asked about ETH 2.0 in an interview and stated the following:

>Ethereum 2.0 chose to be compatible with too many previous features like the account model, some features of the contracts, etc
>This harms ETH's future sharding
>MultiVAC doesn't use the beacon chain structure from the beginning
>Different MTV shards can process the data asynchronously in a parallel way.
>MultiVAC's scalability and flexibility are better.

Not bad for a 2M MCAP. MTV's upside is insane

>> No.16489556 [View]
File: 181 KB, 1405x728, MultiVAC vs ETH 2.0.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16489556

>>16489515
MultiVAC CTO was asked about ETH 2.0 in an interview and stated the following:

>Ethereum 2.0 chose to be compatible with too many previous features like the account model, some features of the contracts, etc
>This harms ETH's future sharding
>MultiVAC doesn't use the beacon chain structure from the beginning
>Different MTV shards can process the data asynchronously in a parallel way.
>MultiVAC's scalability and flexibility are better.

Not bad for a 2M MCAP. MTV's upside is insane

>> No.16479421 [View]
File: 181 KB, 1405x728, MultiVAC vs ETH 2.0.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16479421

>>16479316
>kek Ranjeet getting desperate with his heavy bags
One of the five top projects in crypto with a market cap of only 2M and you ramble on about heavy bags? Are you high? If they pull off sharding they are at least one year ahead of ETH 2.0. They have the technology, just check their testnet. They have the team and they have the opportunity to create sharding clean from scratch as they don't have to drag old technology over to sharding, as Ethereum must do from ETH to ETH 2.0

More info here, see pic:
>Ethereum 2.0 chose to be compatible with too many previous features like the account model, some features of the contracts, etc
>This harms ETH's future sharding
>MultiVAC doesn't use the beacon chain structure from the beginning
>Different MTV shards can process the data asynchronously in a parallel way.
>MultiVAC's scalability and flexibility are better.

Not bad for a 2M MCAP. MTV's upside is insane

>> No.16449853 [View]
File: 181 KB, 1405x728, MultiVAC vs ETH 2.0.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16449853

>>16449800
MultiVAC CTO was asked about ETH 2.0 in an interview and stated the following:

>Ethereum 2.0 chose to be compatible with too many previous features like the account model, some features of the contracts, etc
>This harms ETH's future sharding
>MultiVAC doesn't use the beacon chain structure from the beginning
>Different MTV shards can process the data asynchronously in a parallel way.
>MultiVAC's scalability and flexibility are better.

Not bad for a 2M MCAP. MTV's upside is insane

>> No.16439222 [View]
File: 181 KB, 1405x728, MultiVAC vs ETH 2.0.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16439222

>>16437778
MultiVAC CTO was asked about ETH 2.0 in an interview, and stated the following:

>Ethereum 2.0 chose to be compatible with too many previous features like the account model, some features of the contracts, etc
>This harms ETH's future sharding
>MultiVAC doesn't use the beacon chain structure from the beginning
>Different MTV shards can process the data asynchronously in a parallel way.
>MultiVAC's scalability and flexibility are better.

Not bad for a 1M MCAP. MTV's upside is insane.

>> No.16439068 [View]
File: 181 KB, 1405x728, MultiVAC vs ETH 2.0.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16439068

>>16438209
MultiVAC CTO was asked about ETH 2.0 in an interview and stated the following:

>Ethereum 2.0 chose to be compatible with too many previous features like the account model, some features of the contracts, etc
>This harms ETH's future sharding
>MultiVAC doesn't use the beacon chain structure from the beginning
>Different MTV shards can process the data asynchronously in a parallel way.
>MultiVAC's scalability and flexibility are better.

Not bad for a 1M MCAP. MTV's upside is insane.

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]