/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>55199262
I'm on the fence on this. I've seen some CEO s taking a zero less than CFO or coop. If your time is worth moonlighting at another firm and you don't have a NDA, why not?
>Donna, secretary at hatmule mine, sells every share she's paid with, immediately or sooner, every time
>Donna is secretary for more than one firm
Mfw

>>54865674

>>54585753
>after a while you can just get a feel for a company or project

>>54255081
>>54255177
Mfw

>>53726608

>>53665072
Youd be surprised at the accounting mysticism that goes on to keep companies and broader markets afloat or even alive. Valuations correlation with the books is an illusion. See tulip mania for a gross oversimplification of this desu
>just a tally of how much money the companies have spent on a particular project
Garbage in. Garbage out.
Think on this anon: if an explorer had genuinely found a mother load they wouldn't want to advertise it since then the opportunity to accumulate would/could be facing taller barriers to entry by way of competition with investors which raises the share price (minimizing the opportunity to accumulate) or draw attention from regulators, auditors, etc. However if they don't have shit in their mine then they are incentivized to promote anything they can find to attract bagholders to dump on.
Bob has said exactly this (not verbatim) many times.
This is why corporate/institutional investment activity should be heavily scrutinized and never trusted at face value.
Many posts itt and nearly every thread regarding institutional investment and almost never in a positive light
See
>>53665318
>>53665187
Sprott is mentioned in nearly every thread. If they had something special they wouldn't tell anyone about it
>Picrel
The exception that proves the rule. Their reticence was what sent their garbage mine stock soaring

>>53639082
Irregardless, it's simply intolerable
>>53638362
>Just make your own equation bro
Nigger, please. Come back when you can into maths
>>53636894
I pray for this and more
>>53637910
>The thread is for discussing commodities and making money
Making money is not in the OP tho

>>53593479
Wow
Who could have seen this coming?
I wish that somebody had said something previously. If only someone was capable of recognizing schemes like this, you know, to avoid so many anons taking losses and all. Too bad nobody saw this coming. Not one single person. Not one person. Nobody.

>>53553538
The logistics alone should, all other things being equal, be enough of a factor to be significantly impactful to their ability to provide an fairly inelastic consumable resource for a very competitive price point. Another anon asked about overland options via rail bridge from newfoundland but I have yet to explore that. Not that anyone else should do this, but I consider logistics to carry the same weight as jurisdiction when it comes to mining in any way, manner, shape, form, or fashion.
What good is an unregulated wild west if you can't get a road, airstrip, sea port, or whatever to the mine?
What good is a brand new road, airstrip or seaport if you can't get a permit to operate the mine?
This is why I even bought salt in the first place. Comparatively, they should be able to elbow their way to the table, should they have the intent to produce. Maybe just poise to take a seat only to bluff another player to buy you out so you don't compete.
I wouldn't be sending my people to conferences and running up tabs, I'd start hiring outside firms to assess barriers to entry, maybe even employ a couple of hired guns to make waves in the right direction. Nothings as unnerving as fearlessness