/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>50623457
Does chainlink doom you?
>saturn/cube worship
>216, your picrel
>i'm gay and i hold chainlink meme
>sergey idol worship
>every thread filled with lies
>picrel, which contains multiple sigils of satan and which many linkies actually charged
>spiritual successor to SWIFT, the messaging control grid
>acts like a behelit
it feels spiritually dubious to hold this thing.

>>29544433
>>29544455
>>29544488

>>21147651

>>18562437
she didn't get any of my cummies, those are reserved for pic related

Of course I did. It enhances the memetic charge.

>>17699671
i have coomed to this at least 5 nights per week since september 27, i get 90% of the way there with thoughts of some roastie or my oneitis then i finish strictly to pic related, is my soul going to be ok?

>>17387677
checked, sir

sigil has been charged

>>16583336
A miner somewhere finds the correct hash adds it to the chain and is now in possession of a copy of "the longest chain". They broadcast this new longest chain to the entire network and the network accepts it because it is the current longest chain. This process continues forever as long as there are miners and users of the network (people sending funds from one public address to another). The chief vulnerability of this method of consensus is that if a single entity controls 51% of the mining hardware or more then there is a 100% chance that eventually (in a matter of hours to days, depending on the amount of mining resources controlled) they will be able to send/spend funds in one block, and then privately mine a separate chain that outpaces and becomes longer than the real longest chain. They broadcast the fake longest chain to the real network and the network accepts it, thereby allowing for a double spend of digital funds. The whole point of decentralizing mining, that is, desiring for many independent nodes to be mining at disparate places around the world, is to prevent this sort of 51% collusion attack. In practice, it is someone undesirable to execute a 51% attack since the attacker usually has to mine a shitload of blocks and use a shitload of electricity ($$$) to outpace the real chain, making it financially unrewarding.

The result of all this is a chain of transactions that can't be argued with (is immutable) due to how difficult the protocol makes it to double spend digital tokens.

Extend this now to any digital agreement rather than simply a transfer of funds. Such digital agreements would inherit the immutability that these digital tokens enjoy.

>>16423576
i jerk my dick to pic related

>>16025808
To defeat the jew one must first become the jew

>>16003442

>>15988980
you can start by telling me everything you know about this image

>>15661335
im too high T to not coom

>>14390620
Weve all been jerking off to the sigil for over a year newlinker fag.