/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>13080254
*single fart sound from audience*

I'm actually more qualified to talk about this than most people. I'm employed with a cyber-techno machinations company, I do a lot of security analyst programming type work. Open source, decentralized, APIs, partnerships, you name it. We'd be one of the first companies in line for something like Chainlink, if the decentralized smart contract space had more value over traditional data exchanges. There's a catch though, an underlying flaw more deeply embedded in the bedrock of LINK than the very code itself. The flaw is with the concept, and it's this: Companies won't actually go through the hassle of trusting their data API's through crypto.
>Now I can already hear your keyboards going frantic, but hear me out. We hate banks, and traditional data providers. But actual companies, businesses, and investors do not. There's an old saying you might have heard of: "If it ain't broke, don't fix it!". The idea that any of our bosses would give us the go ahead if we approached them to put our companies valuable data in a smart contract on a cryptocurrency called Chainlink, that they've never heard of, we'd be laughed out at best and fired on the spot at worst. We already have API data buyers and providers we trust.
>The truth is LINK is fucking useless! It's vaporware! You have funded some fat plaid wearing goofball who goes on tour presenting the same slides just so the project avoids being labelled an exit scam.

>>13016577
>>13016588
>>13016559
Here's one with Sergay's wig casting a shadow.

>>13016547
This guy really knows how to fill a room and by that I mean he is fat and not that anyone cares to hear him speak

>>13016565