/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>53879552
yea but that's easier said then done like who would've thought that i5 2500 era INTCels would just wiff nonstop for the next 10 years technologically, followed by actively trying to destroy the company? Who would've thought a "safe" investment like NSC could get mixed up in a Chernobyl-tier event? What household-name companies currently in the S&P don't have the potential to be seen as faded glory? You have to know man. you have to be there. So that leaves safe boomer index funds and ultra degenerate coomer garbage stocks or at best risky midcaps. It's all speculation so if you're gonna bet as retail might as well swing for the fences.

>>53879541
I mean I've got some boomer longs too I'm just referring to the fact I'm holding bonds like a midwit and worried I'll get BTFO by a surprise bull market

>>53879523
so they are just telling us directly they're bearish? isn't that bad strategy?

>>53700488
mid-term:
>MRO
>AEM
>TECK

short term:
>3M treasuries
>Cash