/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>55744791
noooo dont say that Anon, my positions are excellent, Broker-chan would never make fun of me like that stop lying she would have advised me otherwise shes warned me about risky option plays in the past and she looks out for me

>>18673167
but as a government utility they are to be expected to operate at some type of loss in order to provide service that a private company would be hard pressed to not abuse, right?

I can understand the idea of a government postal service needing to be adjusted for the sake of correcting its own books, but to suddenly take the postal service and make it exponentially more expensive at a time like this is kind of ridiculous. It's price gouging at a time when every company is price gouging.

Like honestly, what the fuck? How is bleeding Americans dry through postage price increase going to solve our immediate problem? Especially when no one has any money because they got furloughed or outright laid off, and Postage is the only feasible way to move product because of social distancing? Do they expect to make an entire office's pension back in the beginning of a Super-Recession?

All increasing the Post Office's prices at a time like this will do is drive demand way down to the point where they'll be more insolvent than they were before. I could see slowly increasing the costs over a period of time, but a x4 increase will kill the Postal Service.

Is he just trying to aggressively attack the issues he knows about to compensate for the failure this whole thing has been so far?

How much of a mess was this government when he inherited it?
And how much mess did he add so far?

>>18585222

that is like one day of regular consumption

this simulation is getting weird, i feel unwell