/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>55050469
the cognitive dissonance from some of the people in this general and biz is remarkable
one of the biggest parroted points about metals is that its surpressed, down from ATH (especially when accounting for inflation)
I consider this to be bullish
heres the simple analysis
FIRST, my assumptions: LINK's usage will grow, it will continue to be the primary oracle in the blockchain eco system and each time it is used a minor fee will be paid in LINK

Now for the analysis.
there are 1 billion LINK tokens (currently priced well under an oz of silver). Like silver LINK can be "recycled" perhaps silver is a bit more difficult to recycle LINK but regardless it can be.
However we pull 1 billion oz out of the ground per year, there are only 1 billion LINK ever, also eventually you will get an APY on LINK (which silver can't do)
so simply put I will continue buying LINK (and a short list of other cryptos) till I feel they are in a bull run.
Then I will switch back to metals.
If metals have a bull run first, I will do remarkably well considering my physical stack and my miner portfolio in retirement accounts.

I would not recommend this approach for those who don't have what they feel to be a suicide stack in metals
but if you are there switch over to crypto for the time being till this board is filled with moon boys again (by that point you will hit a double and can sell for more metal)
or stay poor not taking money from the retard crypto moon boys

>>55040777
And now Blackrock owns a big chunk of it. Silver is a scam, good thing I invested in Gold instead.

All you retards don't deserve it, but I leave some breadcrumbs here.