/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>54385312
Yes. KILT, ORE, CHEQD, SPARKS etc are Everest's answer to Chainlink's Oraclize, Mobius, Rhombus, Shintaku etc
smug hello to anyone reading this in the archive

>>54171885
Everest is the ONLY solution. Learn the difference between identity and identification. The only way for glorified identification sharing projects like Cheqd and Kilt to survive is to integrate Everest.

>>54101206
You will never be a real identity provider. You have no biometrics, you have no regulatory approval, you have no ongoing monitoring. You are a credential sharing platform glorified by buzzwords about blockchain into a crude mockery of true identity.
All the “validation” you get is misunderstanding and non-compliant. Behind your back people mock you. Your peers are disgusted and ashamed of you, your “users” implement actual solutions behind closed doors.

>>53987373
tell me you don't know the difference between identity and identification without telling me

>>53888760
Here's the links!
https://sparks.dev/
https://twitter.com/sparksdev_
https://medium.com/@sparksdev/sparks-5531493554ed
You can find the Sparks Discord and Telegram on the website.

>>53850088
>He thinks this applies to just ORE and not every other non-compliant, credential sharing project.
Cute.

Institutions are utterly repulsed by you. Thousands of years of KYC and AML have allowed institutions to sniff out frauds with incredible efficiency. Even DIDs who “verify” through soul bound tokens and ZKP won’t be accepted. Your lack of biometry at the base level is a dead giveaway. And even if you manage to get a green check mark NFT, any serious clients will turn tail and bolt the second they gets a whiff of your failure to acquire a license.
You will never be compliant. You wrench out a fake verification every single morning and tell yourself it’s going to be ok, but deep inside you feel the regulation creeping up like a weed, ready to crush you under the unbearable weight.

>>53781699

You will never be a real identity provider. You have no biometrics, you have no regulatory approval, you have no ongoing monitoring. You are a credential sharing platform glorified by buzzwords about blockchain into a crude mockery of true identity.
All the “validation” you get is misunderstanding and non-compliant. Behind your back people mock you. Your peers are disgusted and ashamed of you, your “users” implement actual solutions behind closed doors.

>>53630857
>not regulation compliant
>no sybil resistance
>no unique identity
Many such cases

>>53616120

>>53564604
If only you knew how retarded you really are.

>>53553392

You will never be a real identity provider. You have no biometrics, you have no regulatory approval, you have no ongoing monitoring. You are a credential sharing platform glorified by buzzwords about blockchain into a crude mockery of true identity.
All the “validation” you get is misunderstanding and non-compliant. Behind your back people mock you. Your peers are disgusted and ashamed of you, your “users” implement actual solutions behind closed doors.
Institutions are utterly repulsed by you. Thousands of years of KYC and AML have allowed institutions to sniff out frauds with incredible efficiency. Even DIDs who “verify” through soul bound tokens and ZKP won’t be accepted. Your lack of biometry at the base level is a dead giveaway. And even if you manage to get a green check mark NFT, any serious clients will turn tail and bolt the second they gets a whiff of your failure to acquire a license.
You will never be compliant. You wrench out a fake verification every single morning and tell yourself it’s going to be ok, but deep inside you feel the regulation creeping up like a weed, ready to crush you under the unbearable weight.
Eventually it’ll be too much to bear - you’ll buy $ID, run a VNO, stake your tokens, and comply with regulations. Your clients will find you, relieved that they no longer have to risk dealing with the authorities. They’ll delegate their tokens to a VNO with a better reputation than yours, and every Everchain observer for the rest of eternity will know a superior solution is used. Your project will decay and go back to the dust, or you will be sent to prison and get butt raped daily by Tyrone and his gang.
This is your fate. This is what you chose. There is no turning back.

https://medium.com/@sparksdev/sparks-5531493554ed
>Identities have two types of data, identifiers, and attributes. Using proof of ownership, you’ll be able to prove attributes about yourself without giving up your identifiers. The user will be able to build out one or many identities with one or many attributes and can choose to disclose or validate conditions upon those attributes.
Yikes.