[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance

Search:


View post   

>> No.24858024 [View]
File: 160 KB, 722x540, 1598585605739.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
24858024

>>24857074

>> No.18852391 [View]
File: 160 KB, 722x540, 1583103774520.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18852391

>>18852351
Hmm what about breast milk that feet have been soaking in?

>> No.13852484 [View]
File: 160 KB, 722x540, 126 - luzZidV.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13852484

>>13852368
I make over 100k per year running a Minecraft server and do almost no work. Everyone told me it was a stupid business idea.

>> No.6057409 [View]
File: 160 KB, 722x540, 1513854492585.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6057409

>>6057015
I am only replying because you got trips. DBC PFR PPT OMG ODN.

>> No.5929228 [View]
File: 154 KB, 722x540, 1509454974001.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5929228

Okay I got a question for ya'll Bitcoiners about your coin's roadmap. Please show a source, because I couldn't find an answer for it.
1MB block - small, obviously. Resulting in massive fees. The narrative seemingly has been that raising the block size is "kicking the can down the road" This narrative implies that we need to solve the problem fully (let's ignore for now the fact that bigger blocks does that just fine, as in Ethereum and Dash) or else "kicking the can" will just make us lower priority on solving the problem. Fine. Fair enough. But on Bitcoin Core they're testing LN, so they don't need to kick the can -- they have their proposed solution. So riddle me this: why don't they up the blocksize to 4MB? Hell, even just 2MB? It would alleviate the fees and slow confirmation times while they continue working on LN.
To serve the entire world, Lightning Labs themselves said they would need 133MB blocks eventually, anyway, so why not get started? What's the point of crippling BTC with this measly 1MB as though it's still 1995?

>> No.5300004 [View]
File: 154 KB, 722x540, 1509454974001.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5300004

Don't fall for the BCH ploy, it was invented by (((them))) to destroy Bitcoin.

>> No.4987560 [View]
File: 154 KB, 722x540, 1509454974001.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4987560

Buy my new shitcoin EXTORTIUM: it's now avaiable in only 20% premine. If LTC is BTC's silver, then it's Chainlink's plastic.

>> No.4237353 [View]
File: 154 KB, 722x540, 1509454974001.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4237353

>Lily Allen turned down 200K in Bitcoins for a gig in 2009 which is worth $1,426,199,000 as of this writing
Holy Crab!
Pop star Lily Allen has voiced her regret at refusing to accept payment in Bitcoins for a gig.

The "Hard Out Here"” singer was asked to perform on 3D chat website Second Life from the comfort of her home “about five years ago”.

She turned down the offer as the virtual currency was worth only a small amount at the time and largely reserved for experimental use in online games.

The 28-year-old’s head is now in her hands as a single bitcoin is currently valued at $974 (£593), making “hundreds of thousands” a huge fee to have rejected. Allen’s fortune could be worth more than 20 times her £6m reported worth had she accepted Second Life’s offer.

>> No.4168883 [View]
File: 154 KB, 722x540, 1509454974001.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4168883

I'm goin all in into Bitcoin Gold with x100 leverage, you have one last chance to convince me why I shouldn't. It's like BTC but better since it is anti evil chinese miners.

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]