/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>13418567
lmao

>>13410883
No, it hasn't been proven to work. You're just so thick headed you think that the "UBI experiements" in which a few hundred geographically isolated people amongst a normally functioning economy receiving a few hundred a month is the same as giving free money to every adult in an entire country.

>>13395795
Imagine believing Lightning works. Also imagine supporting this banking layer goldsmith 2.0 IOU scam.

why doesnt he just buy a casa node?
>https://minerupdate.com/2019/04/17/belarus-president-proposes-giant-data-centre-for-bitcoin-mining/

>>13372524
I bet this guy thinks he's verifying transactions on his laptop.

>>13352464
>i don't like segwit one bit
Might be the smartest thing you've said.

>2.Transactions We define an electronic coin as a chain of digital signatures. Each owner transfers the coin to the next by digitally signing a hash of the previous transaction and the public key of the next owner and adding these to the end of the coin. A payee can verify the signatures to verify the chain of ownership.

>even satoshi said it's not a good idea
Where did Satoshi say 0-conf was to be avoided? Sauce me please. Because the only thing I've seen out of him is defending its use. Double spending a 0-conf is almost impossible. Its more secure than any credit card. If I were a merchant I would gladly accept 0-conf. If you're talking large sums of cash, yeah wait for confirmation, but otherwise its pretty goddamn secure.

>rbf
Absolute garbage and actually should be avoided.

>>13349421
>LINK
heh

I think it'll be two to three years, myself. I do think that waiting for dips could prove dangerous though-it seems to be on a good, steady upward trajectory. BTC will have to go to 15k to realize the same gains that BAT would get reaching a single measly dollar (I'm not counting it out from doing that for the record-isn't the lightning network supposed to fix BTC's abysmal transaction times for example? Once that technical problem is solved all bets are off, but I still don't mind using these BAT bags as a pillow for now)

>>13283046
VAT is a direct tax on YOU you fucking retard

>>13283250
Non-sequitur

>>13283838
Why wouldn't it? Because Yang flippantly claims it won't without offering any hard numbers in support of that ludicrous assertion? You are fucking stupid, kid

>>13228078
Communism is gay

>30K EOY!

>bitcorn da footure!

Describe the current state of crypto in 1 pic

>>13082612
That's bullshit. My old man lives in saint paul and not only is there potholes absolutely everywhere but the city actually billed him directly because of it. Taxation is theft and only retarded micro-dick norwegians that think that their having been taxed to such a surplus over the past 30 years that the government could give them all a house (but won't, LOL) is a good thing. Take your "free" shit and shove it up your ass, retard.

>>13072929
Oh, ok; thanks fren

>>13033357
>not taking something is the same as giving something

>>13006214
I'm 12 and what is this?

God dammit this is torture

>>12951856
It's 2.5+ trillion a year deficit after the proposed VAT as well as public spending consolidation (SNAP receipients get a lot more, granny gets the same etc.) and doesn't account for market adjustments

Yang's argument? "We spent 4 trillion once 10 years ago and (((nothing bad happened))) so obviously spending 2/3rds of that every single year should be just fine (this is literally what he says in his white paper). He's a fucking retard and so are you.

>>12950389
It connects the raspberry pi to the hard drive, but I'm sure they could've designed this better. It's a $300 full Bitcoin node

>>12948706
Oh, okay; it's all good, then

>bitcoin dur footure

Lightning network is the future