/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>19142210
I mean, my average for STNG's 200 shares is 17.5. I really don't need a high bounce for that particular investment to go profitable, so I am sort of glad it was kept down for now. But I most assuredly agree it should be WAY higher. I hope returns go well too, in truth out of all tankers for whatever reason the algos trade that correlatively inverse with Crude the hardest. Which is hilarious since it theoretically should be one of the least correlative. But, gave a good buying opportunity due to it and if oil goes down...as we all think it will, will also give it a nice bump.

>>19142181
Nice. I should look up the other tankers to see how their options day went.

>>19142430
If the government pays for tankers then our tanker stocks are flying right past the moon and into the fucking sun. Companies are making 1000%+ profit already, and NOW you are telling me they are going to get government funds on top of it? I know this is a fantasy scenario, but my SCO could fucking go to 0 for all I care if that would be its cause because that would make us rich as sin. It would be impossible to be any more bullish than the US government paying your tankers to store oil, and probably at even BETTER rates.