/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>27341035
>Price won't go to the moon until SEC shit is resolved.
I completely disagree that shit has no bearing on price atm especially with all the normies fomoing any random shitcoin because of the gamestop news lately, but i think xrp has to retest around 40 cents, not likely that it breaks 70 from here imo

>>23500926
Maybe youre not a retard after all then, congrats

>>20505095
>>20507393
I absolutely love your doll whenever I see it in these threads. I want to get one one day.

>>19316624
>vision paper
Otherwise known as an LSD tab. Classic McAfee.

>>18584240
>shopping around for new house
>pick the one with the squeakiest doors and drawers to save money

>>17142096
grats fellow /biz/raeli. i remember my first 6 figure gain in 2017. it's a big milestone. you got a lot of ahead of you. this bullrun is just getting underway.

>>17006720
Roger, you're a coiner, you always have been, and that makes us brothers. Happy birthday my brother.

>>16823586
Hi fren

>>16765478
>>"they neither confirmed nor denied that the company was an official Cloud Partner."
>>"searches for ‘blockchain’, ‘oracle’, ‘chainlink’ and so on did not return a result on the Google Cloud Partner Directory"

>cope, I guess

Yes that would be your best course of action right now but you're supposed to keep those ideas inside your head you're not supposed to spill it to everyone else.

>>16749242
>Bootleg chicken seller here.
Just when I thought I'd seen it all.

>>16736086
Sounds like half of my mates around the east midlands. Nice one.

>>16657680
>dehydration

>>16633161
>Google Cloud’s main twitter account tweeted
>tweet telling people they may use something

Linkoid confusing a promotion for a partnership.

>>16633758
Corda made their own oracle and I've posted the proof. You're done.

>>16634683
>NOOOOOO you can't just assess my shitcoin holding to see if its a scam like 99.8% of other crypto projects out there, how dare you investigate things to find out if they're true why don't you just believe !!!!!!!???

> I am deeply, DEEPLY concerned with the money of ANONYMOUS posters.
So what do you think of the 80 threads a day telling you to buy something called LINK? If you want to dish it you got to take it. You seem to be ok with floods of concentrated ERC coin shilling but you're very troubled by the idea of someone not buying into something. You're a Chainlink Community Advocate™ and I appear to be fucking with your selling quotas. This is 4chan(nel), we shit on retards like you and laugh at them for fun. Moreso in crypto. If you want to go back to your rebbit echo chamber no one's stopping you.
>Discord
That's literally where Chainlink faggots hang out, officially.

>>16634727
>chainlink has a diehard community and that in itself is very valuable
>200 NEETs with the same ERC token in an Ethereum wallet are very valuable
This is what linkoids actually believe. This is what your 'investment' as been reduced to. They think their folders of frog jpegs have a dollar value. They think their literal shitposts have a dollar value. This isn't 2017, what essentially is an airdrop community is worthless.

>willingness to travel

>>16127925

>>16124282
reminder that tether bobos are mentally retarded

if btc goes to 0 you won't make any money if your shorts are being paid out in BTC

>>15062840
>still can’t tell me I’m lying
>still can’t prove the blockchain wrong

Imagine bagholding over $4.50. So sad.

>I don't have to, Chainlink makes ethereum obsolete. Smart contracts are going to be executed on link nodes eventually, with unlimited scalability.
>I don’t have to
>a JSON parsnip makes Ethereum obsolete
>my 3 man team with no product will beat Ethereum it WILL be back over $4.50 one day omg why did I buy at the top AGAIN

AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Alright faggots I’ll let the rest of the lads take shots at you now, it’s like 7AM and I’m going to bed. Enjoy being broke until I come back and torment the ever living fuck out of you all tomorrow you dumb bagholding cunts.

>>15041847
>posting my pasta
Nice.

>>15041868
False equivalencies are the go-to linkie cope. If you don’t like Chainlink as a system then you thought the Bronze Age was a dumb idea, or something. Tokenomics are scammy as fuck, Chainlink is a shitty wet band-aid solution to a shitty smart contract platform on top of being the fact that it isn’t even a solution because in 2 years, they haven’t actually made anything. Slowly exit scamming selling off their utility turned funding token which is scam^2.

You’re aware you can’t actually USE Chainlink, at this moment, right? Why can’t you admit to yourself that you got straight up scammed, duped, bamboozleda and swindled? Why would a bunch of 23 year olds try to solve some autism computer problem which wouldn’t even make money, when they could dump on you NEETs and walk away with $50 million a piece with no legal repercussions?

>>15032002
I did before. Linkies went silent. I told them over and over but they couldn’t seem to comprehend the idea that in the end, no matter what, I can search for big wallets, wallets of exact amounts or anything else, any other parameter I wish because it’s a fucking open blockchain. They’re acting like an ETH wallet address shows your identity. Yeah I totally recognise who 0x5eD8Cee6b63b1c6AFce3AD7c92f4fD7E1B8fAd9F is. It’s cute linkies are trying to use words like ‘obfuscate’ ironically, for the purpose of bandaging their brainlet damage control.

Maybe drink milk if youre lactose intolerant or eat lots of cheese? I like your style anon

Wow, the thread is still here somehow.

>>14996711
>I made an investment because of funny jpegs

You are mentally retarded.

>>15001766
I promise you anon, I’m phoneposting. This is called an iPhone. It’s from Apple. One day you can upgrade too from your $50 burner pajeetphone. Just keep posting and the Rupees will stack up!

For the rest of you. I’ll leave you with a head scratcher for you all to argue over. Why would Chainlink bar American citizens from the ICO, bar them from investing in Chainlink, then later go seek investment from Americans in Chainlink, while being registered in the Caymen’s anyway to hinder any ideas the SEC might get if they ever knew what Chainlink even was? This question is a fucking checkmate. If you attempt to answer this question in any way, you will dig yourself into a hole. The only way to excuse one thing is to disregard the other aspect. Try to defend one part of the answer and you’ll open the floodgates on the other aspects. This one is a bit too hard for linkies, I perhaps shouldn’t have posted this. It will probably be repeated for ages. Go ahead and try anyway linkies. This should be good.

>>14980062
Spit it out anon

>>14948732
Checked.