/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>17510467
well, obviously, if you can rationalize concepts that adhere to reality for yourself, then you won't necessarily have to rely on people who do understand why a car or a farm works the way it does to simply allow you access to their goods and services for free; you can find something that you are good at by observing the strengths and weaknesses of your person, and then setting and approaching objectives with those observances in mind.

now, i must ask—is there some rule of collectivist doctrine that mandates that any time you are faced with questions whose logical answers invalidate the integrity of your position, you try to change the subject?
even if this isn't the case, why would you want to avoid facing objective truths this hard? do you want to be a poor, invalid pissant for the rest of your life?
why choose this?
i repeat an earlier statement of mine, given its relevancy to this discussion—collectivism is the essence of self-annihilation, and collectivist ideologies are the doctrines of suicide.
you are not impressing anyone of good nature. quite frankly, i am appalled by your approach to debate—which is why i am trying to enlighten not just you, but every other collectivist in this thread. i repeat another earlier statement, from the same post i'd drawn from earlier (>>17507239); i call you worthless and a pissant not because i want you to self-destruct—quite the opposite. i want you to attempt to critically evaluate your ideology.

anon, if you keep this up, then the things that you love in the unique ways that you are able to love them will go on as neglected subjects—all because you choose to believe and spread cultist doctrines of lies without critically evaluating, in practice, how they are supposed to work and why they would work. you're dooming yourself to a life of delusion in which you only grow attributes that work in opposition to those attributes that yielded man his most significant achievements, and his personal victories.