/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>16559022
l o s e t h e f u c k i n g a t t i t u d e . when you present opinions like "nobody would work for $1 per hour" and "wages are kept artificially low" with name-calling in the place of any actual arguments to substantiate those statements, the FIRST THING that's going to come to any reasonable person's mind is "okay, am i dealing with a '''we need to raise the minimum wage''' lobotomite here". you're presenting statements that are products of bringing things to their logical conclusions, but you're presenting them as if everyone were reading a transcript of your ongoing internal monologue; nobody knows how you come to your conclusions when you just make statements that could be interpreted in multiple different ways when there aren't any arguments to back them up, so before you get vindictive at anyone who you think is a scatterbrained retard, it'd be wise to explain your logic so that you don't come off as scatterbrained yourself.
that in mind—what are you trying to get across here? "things would get better if people demanded more from their employers"? if some retard wanted to be fucked in the ass by a spike made out of frozen mercury, why the hell should you care unless they're using your money or property to do it?
i mean, you're absolutely right—people can and SHOULD realize that employers are just as much engaging in a transaction as the employee when they are hiring. what's your point? does them not getting this necessarily make YOU poor, or is it the conditions imposed on you by government that make trying to separate yourself economically from people who practically choose to be slaves nearly impossible the thing that actually IS arguably unfair and IS something that makes you poor?
if you believe that it's regulations that are largely the problem behind so many other people being poor—as i do—then why are you caught up on the notion that it's merely the MISAPPROPRIATION of these regulatory powers that is causing people to become poor?