[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance

Search:


View post   

>> No.4332895 [View]
File: 818 KB, 1024x576, woj.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4332895

EOY 2019 should have the network up and running to a substantial degree. If it's not working on at least some serious level by then, we're probably fucked. But say it is working, it will be the premier Oracle service. There is zero reason why a business would use a centralised oracle service in place of a trustless one, and considering LINKs FMA, its existing industry connections and its level of development, there's no reason to think that LINK won't have a HUGE proportion of the oracle market.

Smart contracts will be massive, ChainLink will be the #1 way to move data to and from Blockchains, and the valuation of the billion tokens will incorporate not just the transactional value of the tokens, but wider speculation as well.

EOY 2019 could potentially see LINKs market cap as half of ETHs current one. Which is around $15 billion. Divide between a billion tokens and that gives you $15 a token, or around 45x gains.

Factor in, however, that a single announcement from a single major player could shoot it far higher. If LINK is the default solution for, say, BNP Paribas, who hold assets of $2 trillion and who supplied banking data to ChainLink for the SIBOS demo, then the sky is really the limit.

$100 a token is not impossible within 10-15 years.

>> No.4328492 [View]
File: 818 KB, 1024x576, woj.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4328492

>> No.4319992 [View]
File: 818 KB, 1024x576, woj.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4319992

>>4319966

Dub dubs and 666 in your ID. I guess that's SWIFT confirmed.

>> No.4312134 [View]
File: 818 KB, 1024x576, woj.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4312134

Is there an easily navigable archive of /biz/ from a year ago? I want to go back and read some old threads.

>> No.4310805 [View]
File: 818 KB, 1024x576, woj.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4310805

>>4310751

>> No.4298938 [View]
File: 818 KB, 1024x576, woj.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4298938

>>4298727

LINK of course.

>> No.4298837 [View]
File: 818 KB, 1024x576, woj.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4298837

IT HURTS SO BAD

Navigation
View posts[-48][-24][+24][+48][+96]