[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance

Search:


View post   

>> No.58243298 [View]
File: 2.08 MB, 500x500, 1666406041401429.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
58243298

>just hate chainlink
>oh yeah
>i hate chainlink
>oh yeah
>hate hate chainlink
>oh yeah
>hatin hatin chainlink
>yes it's true
>hatin chainlink
>how bout u

>> No.57832213 [View]
File: 2.08 MB, 500x500, 1666406041401429.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
57832213

>>57831328
cope
cope
cope
cope
cope

>> No.57285859 [View]
File: 2.08 MB, 500x500, 1666406041401429.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
57285859

hi.
precious metals are great
crypto is not good at all
hello. goodbye.

>> No.55681374 [View]
File: 2.08 MB, 500x500, 1669018750320294.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
55681374

>>55680969
Seraphis will be implemented before mainnet launch (as per their development update posted a few days ago). Their modus operandi is to support various tx types, so Seraphis will be used for bridges/swaps where multi-sig is required, I think they worked with Sarang on the Triptych paper to address the multi-sig issue, because it's active right now, and I looked over "Discreet Core" (their C++ cryptolib) and it's a modified one of the initial PoC that was published.

The reason I'm bullish and decided to bunch a dump of BNB into this is because it's so fucking rare to see a team actually work towards something useful. I think you have a point that 86k tx/s is not gonna mean automatic adoption, but when Discript comes out, with their grants they have talked about, then it's very obviously likely to attract ADA developers that got treated as exit liquidity by IOHK.

If AZERO (which Aurem, their confidential proof of stake protocol) is anything to go off of, fees will be really slow because hotseat comittee + inexpensive hardware to validate blocks = cheap fees while still being manageable for validator node operators.

I'm in, I don't care if it goes nowhere, I'm happy to hear they got the CEX listing, we need more privacy coins regardless, and for once I'm happy in 6 years of browsing /biz/ that there's a coin that's not poopoo. I'm in the testnet group right now, and it's filled with (non-team) developers trying to build shit, so that's a good sign. An earlier thread I read had an API setup that was public-facing and there's talks of independent web/mobile wallets.

Community is good, discussion about a project is good, especially if it can catch the eyeballs of other developers for that ecosystem. Once IOHK goes the way of Enron, that's gonna be... exciting.

>> No.55650163 [View]
File: 2.08 MB, 500x500, 1669018750320294.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
55650163

>>55650112
REMINDER: Seraphis will be implemented before mainnet launch (as per their development update posted a few days ago). Their modus operandi is to support various tx types, so Seraphis will be used for bridges/swaps where multi-sig is required, I think they worked with Sarang on the Triptych paper to address the multi-sig issue, because it's active right now, and I looked over "Discreet Core" (their C++ cryptolib) and it's a modified one of the initial PoC that was published.

The reason I'm bullish and decided to bunch a dump of BNB into this is because it's so fucking rare to see a team actually work towards something useful. I think you have a point that 86k tx/s is not gonna mean automatic adoption, but when Discript comes out, with their grants they have talked about, then it's very obviously likely to attract ADA developers that got treated as exit liquidity by IOHK.

If AZERO (which Aurem, their confidential proof of stake protocol) is anything to go off of, fees will be really slow because hotseat comittee + inexpensive hardware to validate blocks = cheap fees while still being manageable for validator node operators.

I'm in, I don't care if it goes nowhere, I'm happy to hear they got the CEX listing, we need more privacy coins regardless, and for once I'm happy in 6 years of browsing /biz/ that there's a coin that's not poopoo. I'm in the testnet group right now, and it's filled with (non-team) developers trying to build shit, so that's a good sign. An earlier thread I read had an API setup that was public-facing and there's talks of independent web/mobile wallets.

Community is good, discussion about a project is good, especially if it can catch the eyeballs of other developers for that ecosystem. Once IOHK goes the way of Enron, that's gonna be... exciting.

>>55650111
Check'd & wrong

>>55650144
Read above.

>> No.55611018 [View]
File: 2.08 MB, 500x500, 1669018750320294.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
55611018

>>55609626
REMINDER: Seraphis will be implemented before mainnet launch (as per their development update posted a few days ago). Their modus operandi is to support various tx types, so Seraphis will be used for bridges/swaps where multi-sig is required, I think they worked with Sarang on the Triptych paper to address the multi-sig issue, because it's active right now, and I looked over "Discreet Core" (their C++ cryptolib) and it's a modified one of the initial PoC that was published.

The reason I'm bullish and decided to bunch a dump of BNB into this is because it's so fucking rare to see a team actually work towards something useful. I think you have a point that 86k tx/s is not gonna mean automatic adoption, but when Discript comes out, with their grants they have talked about, then it's very obviously likely to attract ADA developers that got treated as exit liquidity by IOHK.

If AZERO (which Aurem, their confidential proof of stake protocol) is anything to go off of, fees will be really slow because hotseat comittee + inexpensive hardware to validate blocks = cheap fees while still being manageable for validator node operators.

I'm in, I don't care if it goes nowhere, I'm happy to hear they got the CEX listing, we need more privacy coins regardless, and for once I'm happy in 6 years of browsing /biz/ that there's a coin that's not poopoo. I'm in the testnet group right now, and it's filled with (non-team) developers trying to build shit, so that's a good sign. An earlier thread I read had an API setup that was public-facing and there's talks of independent web/mobile wallets.

Community is good, discussion about a project is good, especially if it can catch the eyeballs of other developers for that ecosystem. Once IOHK goes the way of Enron, that's gonna be... exciting.

>> No.55592806 [View]
File: 2.08 MB, 500x500, 1669018750320294.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
55592806

>>55592734
REMINDER: Seraphis will be implemented before mainnet launch (as per their development update posted a few days ago). Their modus operandi is to support various tx types, so Seraphis will be used for bridges/swaps where multi-sig is required, I think they worked with Sarang on the Triptych paper to address the multi-sig issue, because it's active right now, and I looked over "Discreet Core" (their C++ cryptolib) and it's a modified one of the initial PoC that was published.

The reason I'm bullish and decided to bunch a dump of BNB into this is because it's so fucking rare to see a team actually work towards something useful. I think you have a point that 86k tx/s is not gonna mean automatic adoption, but when Discript comes out, with their grants they have talked about, then it's very obviously likely to attract ADA developers that got treated as exit liquidity by IOHK.

If AZERO (which Aurem, their confidential proof of stake protocol) is anything to go off of, fees will be really slow because hotseat comittee + inexpensive hardware to validate blocks = cheap fees while still being manageable for validator node operators.

I'm in, I don't care if it goes nowhere, I'm happy to hear they got the CEX listing, we need more privacy coins regardless, and for once I'm happy in 6 years of browsing /biz/ that there's a coin that's not poopoo. I'm in the testnet group right now, and it's filled with (non-team) developers trying to build shit, so that's a good sign. An earlier thread I read had an API setup that was public-facing and there's talks of independent web/mobile wallets.

Community is good, discussion about a project is good, especially if it can catch the eyeballs of other developers for that ecosystem. Once IOHK goes the way of Enron, that's gonna be... exciting.

>> No.54627538 [View]
File: 2.08 MB, 500x500, 1666406041401429.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
54627538

the link of the chain

>> No.54059732 [View]
File: 2.08 MB, 500x500, 1666406041401429.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
54059732

yes

>> No.53957825 [View]
File: 2.08 MB, 500x500, 1666406041401429.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
53957825

>>53957642
we are the true champions
we rise above both the rentoid and the mortgagoid
>b-but u cant have sex
lol ok incel. it's hasn't stopped me

>> No.53888114 [View]
File: 2.08 MB, 500x500, 1666406041401429.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
53888114

>>53886492
I've also noticed an uptick of people who never thought about owning a home before feeling like they absolutely need to buy now
lol

>> No.53885151 [View]
File: 2.08 MB, 500x500, 1666406041401429.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
53885151

you are not allowed to notice that the evil people are disproportionately jewish

>> No.53626508 [View]
File: 2.08 MB, 500x500, 24B6F58D-140D-4FAA-ACB6-AB2824B77714.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
53626508

>>53626233
https://gcpdot.com/
>33
ok so our consciousness all thinks the same thing
up or down then? for bitcoin/stocks i mean

>> No.53596207 [View]
File: 2.08 MB, 500x500, 1668023104231852.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
53596207

The dump is no longer low volume, funding is still positive and these red candles keep on closing. Are you ready for what's next?

>> No.53428231 [DELETED]  [View]
File: 2.08 MB, 500x500, 1667664435886404.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
53428231

>>53426890
Obligatory: Seraphis will be implemented before mainnet launch (as per their development update posted a few days ago). Their modus operandi is to support various tx types, so Seraphis will be used for bridges/swaps where multi-sig is required, I think they worked with Sarang on the Triptych paper to address the multi-sig issue, because it's active right now, and I looked over "Discreet Core" (their C++ cryptolib) and it's a modified one of the initial PoC that was published.

The reason I'm bullish and decided to bunch a dump of BNB into this is because it's so fucking rare to see a team actually work towards something useful. I think you have a point that 86k tx/s is not gonna mean automatic adoption, but when Discript comes out, with their grants they have talked about, then it's very obviously likely to attract ADA developers that got treated as exit liquidity by IOHK.

If AZERO (which Aurem, their confidential proof of stake protocol) is anything to go off of, fees will be really slow because hotseat comittee + inexpensive hardware to validate blocks = cheap fees while still being manageable for validator node operators.

I'm in, I don't care if it goes nowhere, I'm happy to hear they got the CEX listing, we need more privacy coins regardless, and for once I'm happy in 6 years of browsing /biz/ that there's a coin that's not poopoo. I'm in the testnet group right now, and it's filled with (non-team) developers trying to build shit, so that's a good sign. An earlier thread I read had an API setup that was public-facing and there's talks of independent web/mobile wallets.

Community is good, discussion about a project is good, especially if it can catch the eyeballs of other developers for that ecosystem. Once IOHK goes the way of Enron, that's gonna be... exciting. I will post this every thread out of spite for the anon that wrote it.

>> No.53286791 [View]
File: 2.08 MB, 500x500, 1667664435886404.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
53286791

>>53286212
The 1inch is literally a scam, it's doubtful if youre even gonna be able to claim BDIS/EDIS for DIST on mainnet launch lmfao

>> No.52889658 [View]
File: 2.08 MB, 500x500, 1666406041401429.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
52889658

>>52889651
dont be sad its over
he happy it happened

>> No.52843576 [View]
File: 2.08 MB, 500x500, D1B0F636-4E02-41D2-90C8-880502AE16C0.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
52843576

>BS in Psychology
>$47k
Could be worse. I work in finance though.

>> No.52828654 [View]
File: 2.08 MB, 500x500, 1666406041401429.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
52828654

>>52827670
ah i see u have witnessed society's first of many contradictions

>> No.52813420 [View]
File: 2.08 MB, 500x500, 1666406041401429.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
52813420

i say bay
you say horse
BAY

>> No.52733934 [View]
File: 2.08 MB, 500x500, 1667664435886404.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
52733934

>>52731697
Obligatory: Seraphis will be implemented before mainnet launch (as per their development update posted a few days ago). Their modus operandi is to support various tx types, so Seraphis will be used for bridges/swaps where multi-sig is required, I think they worked with Sarang on the Triptych paper to address the multi-sig issue, because it's active right now, and I looked over "Discreet Core" (their C++ cryptolib) and it's a modified one of the initial PoC that was published.

The reason I'm bullish and decided to bunch a dump of BNB into this is because it's so fucking rare to see a team actually work towards something useful. I think you have a point that 86k tx/s is not gonna mean automatic adoption, but when Discript comes out, with their grants they have talked about, then it's very obviously likely to attract ADA developers that got treated as exit liquidity by IOHK.

If AZERO (which Aurem, their confidential proof of stake protocol) is anything to go off of, fees will be really slow because hotseat comittee + inexpensive hardware to validate blocks = cheap fees while still being manageable for validator node operators.

I'm in, I don't care if it goes nowhere, I'm happy to hear they got the CEX listing, we need more privacy coins regardless, and for once I'm happy in 6 years of browsing /biz/ that there's a coin that's not poopoo. I'm in the testnet group right now, and it's filled with (non-team) developers trying to build shit, so that's a good sign. An earlier thread I read had an API setup that was public-facing and there's talks of independent web/mobile wallets.

Community is good, discussion about a project is good, especially if it can catch the eyeballs of other developers for that ecosystem. Once IOHK goes the way of Enron, that's gonna be... exciting.

>> No.52723746 [View]
File: 2.08 MB, 500x500, 1667664435886404.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
52723746

>>52722132
Obligatory: Seraphis will be implemented before mainnet launch (as per their development update posted a few days ago). Their modus operandi is to support various tx types, so Seraphis will be used for bridges/swaps where multi-sig is required, I think they worked with Sarang on the Triptych paper to address the multi-sig issue, because it's active right now, and I looked over "Discreet Core" (their C++ cryptolib) and it's a modified one of the initial PoC that was published.

The reason I'm bullish and decided to bunch a dump of BNB into this is because it's so fucking rare to see a team actually work towards something useful. I think you have a point that 86k tx/s is not gonna mean automatic adoption, but when Discript comes out, with their grants they have talked about, then it's very obviously likely to attract ADA developers that got treated as exit liquidity by IOHK.

If AZERO (which Aurem, their confidential proof of stake protocol) is anything to go off of, fees will be really slow because hotseat comittee + inexpensive hardware to validate blocks = cheap fees while still being manageable for validator node operators.

I'm in, I don't care if it goes nowhere, I'm happy to hear they got the CEX listing, we need more privacy coins regardless, and for once I'm happy in 6 years of browsing /biz/ that there's a coin that's not poopoo. I'm in the testnet group right now, and it's filled with (non-team) developers trying to build shit, so that's a good sign. An earlier thread I read had an API setup that was public-facing and there's talks of independent web/mobile wallets.

Community is good, discussion about a project is good, especially if it can catch the eyeballs of other developers for that ecosystem. Once IOHK goes the way of Enron, that's gonna be... exciting. I will post this every thread out of spite for the anon that wrote it.

>> No.52685919 [View]
File: 2.08 MB, 500x500, 1667664435886404.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
52685919

>>52685896
t. kaspa shill that is literally a scam

>> No.52654525 [View]
File: 2.08 MB, 500x500, 1667664435886404.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
52654525

>>52654493
Many such cases. But you have the DIST ICO staring you right in the face, and that's a layer-1.

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]