/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>55230808

>>55091390
innit

>>49508032
A fellow Tyler.
Do you post in the comment section? "Based Fren" maybe?
I've been saying at numerous occasions that the "3x inverse Gartman" has been one of the most successful investment strategies over the past decade+
Not even the "3x inverse Cramer" comes close.

>>23111819
>How long have you listened to him.
Very scarcely before Trump, which leads me to barely remember anything from his show during that time.
I started listening regularly shortly after Trumps inauguration.
But it became very evident that Dave, like many others, were changing their format and topics to appease to the "boomers" or as you said he became a "propaganda operation."
Dave, and many other channels like his, are either paid2produce operations or simply dishonest people that jumped up on the latest trend of "boomer larps" because they knew they would have an audience.
Nowadays, Dave and his "a" show (the financial one) serve much like as a contrarian indicator for me as I know he fabricates make believe stories of the great Q/Trump/Deep State/Swamp/Patriot LARP.
After Trumps presidency, his followers will likely be worse off financially than before. Yet the only one who's become a millionaire will be Dave.

Someone I truly enjoy listening to nowadays is Greg Mannarino. He's been on an epic roll for about two years now but I expect that one day he will be wrong again.
And not just wrong once but wrong time after time again. Maybe the Mannarino will serve me as a new contrarian indicator then.
Not wanting to sound too high and mighty but I nowadays even read Zerohedge for little more than entertainment purposes.
Almost 100% of the time the polar opposite happens to what they either report on the markets or predict about the markets.
Yes, even the polar opposite of what they report on in a past tense.
>"Futures plunge into the red as stimulus hopes fade."
>checks charts 60 minutes later
>E-mini S&P 500 future +0,5% in the green.
On a humorous side note: The "inverse Gartman" has been one of the most profitable trading and investing strategies over the past decade. T-Thanks Zerohedge.

>>18994358

>>16835643
one might argue that it's Gartman.
however, for someone to be wrong 100% of the time, like Gartman, one has to have access to insider information.

>>16090244
Yes, it is going to happen and once it did it will become the "new normal" very quickly.
It will shift the Overton window on fiscal policy so much that once negative rates have been established as the "new normal" you will hear the (((experts))), (((analysts))) and (((economists))) who today oppose negative rates doing a complete 180 by then sounding the loudest of alarms once some "lunatic" proposes to raise the interest rates into positive terriroty or even just to zero again.
Even Peter Schiff and all the other financial doomsday prophets will eventually succumb to this new normal as the (((System))) will chug along even at minus whatever interest rates.