>>51366839I posted this I found on shitter a couple of times but nobody seemed to connect the dots. Not just lloyds either,>due to economic circumstances that affect the banking industry, we may restrict the amount you can have in your accounts either by applying a limit or by imposing a charge.
>>51194811>>51194941You could be right. Some guy on twitter reckoned that Lloyds might either restrict the amount you can have in your account by imposing a limit or a charge if you go over some threshold value. Same with Halifax too. Smells like a possible collapse and impending bank bail-iin like what happened in Cyprus and Italy.
Holy shit. It's like the banks want me to put everything in crypto. Why cap the amount a bank account can contain unless you're trying to reduce your liabilities in the event of a banking collapse?