/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>30179059
Just like your Bank of America lie.

>>29549574
>MasterCard + Wirex + Nano is a very possible reality.
Oh, yes, just like your Bank of America pump and dump scheme.

>>29515654
>Oh, Wirex coming to USA, NANO ATM's in the UK, MasterCard partnering with Wirex to bring crypto mastercard to USA (NANO is a premier WIREX Partner)
Yet another insane Nano scam rumor. Just as you did with Amazon, Bank of America, PayPal, Coinbase etc etc.

>>28856161
After Nano devs lied through their teeth about 7000 tps (reality roughly 1% of that, 75 tps), Nano scammers have routinely pushed insane lies about Nano partnerships every other month. Pic related.

>>28761725
Nano has less than 1000 tps, a fraction of the 7 000 tps Nano devs lied about in 2017. There is no way in hell Mastercard can work with Nano.

Nano has a long history of pushing fabricated partnerships.

>>24084371
>>24084676
Nano is so shit that the only thing that keeps up the price above 0 is multiple scam operations. Pic related. Latest scam is the stupid devs presenting cps and not tps to their retarded Nano audience. Rightfully knowing that they are too stupid to see understand the difference. It was clearly impossible for Nano devs to fix Nano's crashed tech and would once again prefer to lie about tps. It takes two confirmations per transaction to do one transaction. So when Nano scammers run around and bitch about 1500 tps, they really mean 1500 cps, that really is only 750 tps. Roughly 10% of what the scammy Nano devs lied about late 2017

"Remember that even just 50 TPS (100 CPS)"
https://forum.nano.org/t/nano-stress-tests-measuring-bps-cps-tps-in-the-real-world/436

>>24041337
Take a good look at the insane comments from you Nanoids in this very thread. Or maybe you are so mentally handicapped yourself that you are unable to detect mental insanity and people writing while doing hard drugs (to cope with Nano's vile market crash).

>>24041373
>But for the record I am close to having a 100k stack, so suck my dick faggot :)
Yes, you are that old burned out Satanist psychos that hang around Nano threads. Again, are you the idiot rockmesuck blah blah, or not. It can't be that many psycho satanists running around in Nano community, right? Don't just run away, coward.

>>23885296
>This is total bullshit. If it was so easy to spam the network to a halt, how come no one has been able to do so yet?
Nano has crashed multiple times and can't even handle single amateurs trying to spam. Read your own discord, scammer.

>>19219164
So you idiots are lying about Amazon partnership now? What about the old lies about PayPal, Bank of America, etc?

>>16669231
>>16669246
>>16669264
>>16669285
>>16669298
Just as retarded as Nanoids finding "clues" that Bank of America/PayPal etc will use Nano. Pic related.

Central banks have no use for crypto, they have centralized network with full control, as they want it. If they ever wanted anything on blockchain, they would develop it themselves, through Bank for International Settlements. Why are Fantom always only involved with the most corrupt third world hell holes in the world with zero partnership with a clean business in and from a first world country? Fantom is clearly a hybrid of Bitconnect and Nano fanboiz. The stupidity is shocking.
Explain >>16667084

Back to plebbit, idiots. You are too stupid for biz. You have to go back.

>>16624527
Delays and underperformance are two different things. Vitalik has never underperformed. Why are you nano "investors" always so stupid? Pic related.

>>16611799
>Says the kid who's obsessively posting bullshit about a 2 year old bank robbery lmao
Why are you Nanoids always so stupid? Your comment and pic related.

>>16327915
How is it going with your usual Bank of America lie, from the delusional nano community?

>>16233323
Shouldn't you nanoids post your usual fake rumours and scam some newbies? Pic related.

>>16154031
>That's not even close to true retard
Paypal will use Nano any moment, same with all the global central banks, right? And BoA. Just as you Nanoids have spammed again and again, pic related.

>>14966780
>The saddest cuck on biz everyone
That would be the typical nanoids presenting insane and outlandish rumours as tactical investment data, pic related.

>>14852702
>Can you post more picture of you spamming nano threads, please? Pretty please DAG boy
Sure, you nano idiots did not post your usual scam posts, I did it? Right? Pic related. Do you have any idea how stupid you sound? I was always attacked by the Nano community when I pointed out that these threads were made by Nano liars and scammers.

>>14636599
What is it with Nano and crazy/fake fomo rumors. Don't you understand that you hurt your brand with that garbage? Pic related.

>>14287842
>oh yeah and he works for DAG, think about that while you're pointing and laughing
I don't, at all. I am not even in the crypto business. What is it with you Nanoids and pathological lying?

>>14249982
>you scumfuck
Typical nanoid trying to debate and defend his broken shitcoin. Why don't you try to answer my questions:
>>14249794
and >>14249828

>>14191111
>Protip, multiple parties are developing novel products utilizing Nano.
Protip, BoA will use Nano, pic.

>>13792050
Lies about Nano and BoA.

>>13791697
Lies about Nano and BoA.

>>12628154
Is it the "Bank of America will use Nano" scam? Pic.