/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>22696853
>Don´t worry C "funds are Safu" Z will pay you legal fees.
why would he need to worry? the loser pays, after all. I'd have thought you creglets would be wholly familiar with the principle by now

>>16929595
because he's a fraudulent twat, and the coin is a piece of shit garbage not even chinks want to be associated with

>>16466335
so tell me, who, in your opinion, has done most thus far to further the #delistBSV campaign ? I seem to recall, being booted from the largest crypto exchange was SOLELY and ENTIRELY the result of cregs aforementioned legal bullshit. Maybe, he should sue cz. What ? oh.
And maybe you should be looking nearer to home to ID the majority provider of bsv's woes. With creg, you lose. evryteim

>>16352644
the LOSERS form coingeek making an even bigger arse of themselves than usual, I see. The ex-BBC man must be so proud. Such standards, such quality journalism

>>16299790
yeah, nScam more or less ignore cz (who rekt them most) while threatening every other no-mark with 'legal action' yaddayadda. Odd that. Isn't it

>>15757016
CZ has made, afair, only two or two major fuckups. That horseshit about 'rollbacks' and then launching his own trash which, I'd agree, be a shitcoin too far. That aside, he barely puts a foot wrong and he's in plus karma for many a year yet for his elegant destruction of calvins shitscam. COMPARE this near-flawless track record to the continually-rolling carcrash of fuckups that is the bsv circus. The only reason they are ever newsworthy (outwith their own publications) is the fat fraud being caught at yet some new dubiety, fraud, plagiarism, being btfo'd in court, whatever. OR, they are making stupid fucking pronouncements like this, presumably to publicise congeek: the gathering. As well as their own media. they have to run their own conference as its the only one they'll get invited to. They are also their own only customers. How sad are they ?
>based CZ = the sweet smell of competence, coolness and success
>creg & calvin = incompetent shammers stinking of desperado

>>15010371
eh, ain't that the wrong way around ?
loser.com pays, creg. and that's all you ever do, lose

>>14607849
L O S E R . C O M

>>14057498
>Many such cases
eh, how many cases is he currently on trial for then ? I was thinking of Kleiman/Florida, although, Australian Tax Office appear to be groundworking a criminal case, hes got McCormack libel (if he goes ahead), theres at least justifiable (to say the least) grounds for proceeding against him for libel from Maxwell, few ex-employees he recently slandered - who have I missed? Cz? - nope, he gets his arse handed to him when he tries that. JUST as well cregs got a Law Degree in the old pile eh? Otherwise, this being a fulltime arsehole could turn into an expensive hobby

>>13945353
oh, I doubt cz needs anyones help or encouragement. Difference, of course, being, he'll probably only start legal shit when he's certain of winning

>>13794472
he hasn't brought a SINGLE ONE of them before a court yet. For good reason. I believe he tried with Binance ? (lol) - be a while before he tries that again

>>13779828