[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance

Search:

View post   
>> No.13256259 [View]
File: 134 KB, 800x1000, 20226047_1661695897237449_805546542571192320_n-e1502115594713.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13256259

>>13256132
>>13256149
>>13256124


LINK
>Already in top 50
>No working product
>Use case reduced to automatic retrieval of JSON data

KLEROS
>Barely top 600
>Working product used by Ethfinex and Reuters
>Can be used for anything you can imagine

Which one is a better investment? Which one would have a more probable exist scam? Be honest. What if you look into the repo for both projects and find out you are wrong?

https://github.com/kleros
https://github.com/smartcontractkit

>> No.13246152 [View]
File: 134 KB, 800x1000, 20226047_1661695897237449_805546542571192320_n-e1502115594713.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13246152

Some of you guys have a good brain: would a project as Kleros (for human disputes on smart-contracts) be a risk or a booster for Link?
Imagine their current use case of filtering token registration on Ethfinex: could something like that be done through Chainlink? And could some use case for Chainlink get benefit from having a jury in the blockchain?
I think I have found something interesting but cannot grasp all the implications for us, if any.

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]