/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>15619881
>This is just too obvious that they were pulling funds without prior allocation

>>15157778
LINK is far from being complete. The team needs to acquire more tech and high qualified man power to make LINK complete. This means, as stated by the team since ICO, that they will bring LINK tokens into circulation to pay for those acquisitions. With more and more people becoming aware of LINK and what it will do, the demand will probably stay about the same or even rise slowly over time, with offer slowly rising by the token brought into circulation. If done right, the price should remain stable, or fall/rise a bit, but far from the moonbois claim of 1000eoy and the deluded no-linkers claim with it going to 10 cents. With the price remaining stable and the tokens in circulation rising market cap rises. Easy as that

But as stated above, I'm very conservative, and I might be wrong on assuming that the market will act rational.

>>14999083
>he doesn’t know we know

>>14925078
lol dude...how new are you? 99% of people who fud link are link holders. Not once have i seen pic related being postsed in the fud threads. This is literally from their ICO.