>>14804164
>When i say I am being objective, I mean I am using NUMBERS as the bases to my arguments.
let's take a closer look at that
so you think numbers are the metric through which you can obtain a vantage view of OBJECTIVE reality?
and you think that you are an arbiter of the dynamics of numbers?
how much have you studied on the topic?
I can guarantee it hasn't been as much as me, and I wouldn't consider myself as having any sort of vantage view of OBJECTIVE reality