/biz/ - Business & Finance

Shills hate this and refuse to address any of the points without resorting to ad hom, sealioning, personal attacks or outright stating bullshit to support their counter claims.

>>56538225 (Cross-thread)
>>56538229 (You) (Cross-thread)
>>56538426 (You) (Cross-thread)
>>56538414 (You) (Cross-thread)
>>56538392 (You) (Cross-thread)
>>56538619 (You) (Cross-thread)
>>56538660 (You) (Cross-thread)
>>56539061 (Cross-thread)
>>56539429 (You) (Cross-thread)
>>56540768 (You) (Cross-thread)
>>56541225 (You) (Cross-thread)
>>56541303 (You) (Cross-thread)
>>56541445 (You) (Cross-thread)
>>56541602 (You) (Cross-thread)

not a single one of you can refute any of this

>NOL's (Net operating loses) to be carried over to the going concern means that at least 50% of shareholders must be made whole in the new equity to not force a change of ownership
>Rule 382 stipulates this
>Rule 382 has been discussed by lawyers
>Shares were stopped trading due to this fact as expert markets could effect the use of NOLS
>Bonds are now trading again, which means that shares WILL be trading again shortly
>Shares WILL be reissued again as part of the going concern of the new company
>The BABY has been sold as part of the divestment as per the dockets showing
>Lawyers are now all paid up which means the deal is done

B-but NOL's are irrelevant
>They just are............ok!!!!