/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>30392452
So what do other countries have?

Could you kindly explain the context you are referring to?

Also, what were the reason you called me and I quote: "fucking retard"?

Thank you

>>30350171
> BTC fails to compete where fundamentals matter. All it has going for it now is hype, ignorance and I-Was-Here-First!

"Muh fundamentals" is a vague and abstract term. All of the things I mentioned are objectively true.

People are seeing it as Store of Value, digital goal. Nobody cares what was written in satoshi whitepaper.

Nobody cares about "muh digital currency", "muh fees". High fees are because the thing is ACTUALLY USED.

Guess what, second layer solutions like PayPal, Square, Cashapp, Venmo, Lightning Network will all solve the normie "buy coffee with btc" problem by providing price exposure to BTC in their cash app portfolio while having the backing held in cold storage.

Oh and by the way, if you want to use the "BTC has failed as currency argument" then you will absolutely get wrecked, because Monero will FAIL EVEN HARDER as currency, since there will be no way to trace if payments have been way and it will SCALE EVEN WORSE THAN BITCOIN.

So basically you just shot yourself if you tried to promote Monero using that argument.

DEBUNKED
CHECKED
REKTED
AND SNEED
Also
D I L A T E