/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>28795046
>and still be poor.
You have no clue. You fucked up Nanoids are so delusional. Worst community in crypto by far, pic related.

>>24083994
You can't defend your utter scam and shitcoin against documented facts, so you moronic plebbitors run away to spam biz with new threads. I dared you identify and document where I "lie", but of course you trashy Nano scammers couldn't do that. Much better to spam biz with your old debunked lies again and again, ryte Nano scammer? Your community is the most pathetic and nuts in whole crypto. Pic related.

There is no way in hell that Nano can be a global currency sub 10K TPS. Visa alone has 65K TPS and is not serving the unbanked and not meant for micro-transactions.,
https://usa.visa.com/dam/VCOM/download/corporate/media/visanet-technology/aboutvisafactsheet.pdf

If Nano had the minimum TPS for a global currency, 100K, the costs of running nodes (IO, CPU and bandwith) would be astronomical. Your moronic business model says that node operators shall do it all for free 24/7, all holidays etc. A few seconds without node operators doing it all for free and your whole shit network crashed. You have zero guarantee that the network is stable and usable at all times. Who the hell would invest and use such a shit network?

Plus you have crypto's worst and most inept community. Pic related.

>>16644629
Why is it that you stupid Nano idiots never ever have anything of substance in your comments? Pic related

>>16624163
>Get a load of this retard ahahahahahhaahahhahahahhaahahhahaa.
1. How many people in the world have bank accounts?
2. How many of them have Visa
3. How many people are alive today?

Why are you Nanoids always so retarded and nasty? Pic related.

>>16610100
>do you really believe the horseshit that comes out of your own mouth?
What is it with you Nano fanboiz and raging stupidity combined with a very distinct nastiness? Pic related. I am sure potential Nano investors are truly impressed. Just can't wait to invest in something like that. Right?

>>16237126
>a huge community (50,000+)
That would mostly be people emigrating from the crashed, but larger, Bitconnect community, see >>16236856
and pic.

>>14978716
>This is the state of Nano FUD ladies and gentlemen. Let it be known that Nano is fucking unfuddable.

Yeah, right. You forgot this. After one year, only spam is partly fixed, but now with added Satanism within organization and community. The rest of the Nano horror show is still there. Enjoy:

Dangerous flaws and major problems with Nano
http://archive.is/diUnZ

Nano Heading for Disaster – Dirty Deals with BitGrail
http://archive.is/GGWIG

Nano and Bitgrail leaders scammed over $100 million from Bitgrail
http://archive.is/zAtyl

>>14249948
>Of course it's a good thing
Really? "a cult-like following", like pic, is a good thing?

>>14192635
I have posted less than 6 threads the last 6 months. In your head I am "a full time nano fudder". Delusional.
>you should be ashamed of yourselfyou should be ashamed of yourself
I warned about Nano and I was correct
>you shill absolute scams
So Constellation is a scam? Give me your best documented arguments.

>>13792122
>>13792135
>>13792150
I started to warn about Nano when the price was 3.15 USD last summer. Thanks for displaying in such an obvious way how retarded, toxic and scammy the Nano community is.

>>13791697

>>12619672
>all the people that are holding are new ones.
New community nasty as hell, pic.

>>12612939
As you can see, the Nano community could not answer a single point, but had to retort to mass flagging the criticism. What a sad and nasty bunch. Pic related.

>>12612366
Documented flaws with Nano tech,management etc will never be met with counter arguments, but only with screaming about FUD, ad hominem, mudslinging and verbal abuse. A really, really nasty community. They were more civil when they were in Bitconnect and earned some money, after the Nano devs trashed and backstabbed the Bitgrail victims, and got the bitgrail community instead, the whole Nano community has disintegrated into a giant mental asylum.

>>12589339
A normal and honest community would take this opportunity to expose these "straight out lies (double spending) or things taken out of context", but of course a nasty and dishonest community like the Nano community (Bitconnect 2.0) will not do that, but rather run away.

I challenge you to document my "lies" and things taken out of context". Make me laugh, fool.