/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>56891118
>just shill it already godamnit
BSV, you stupid nigger.

That's besides the point. You're just looking to attack something so you can avoid talking about what a disaster LN is and how antithetical it is to Bitcoin.

The same people who tell you to use LN are the very same who tell you to run your own "node". They tell you to run a node so you can verify the rules of the system are being followed (not enforced). Then they shill you LN a network in which you cannot verify any transactions at all. I hate you cunts so much it's unreal. Satoshi himself said nodes would become specialized server farms. Not untouchable faggots living in their mother's basement.

>>56891196
Gold isn't an electronic peer to peer cash system.

>>56428153
Correct. And any node that doesn't compile PoW isn't a node.

>>19160690
>>19160713
Based

>>18915387
>Now use your 2 braincells and imagine what would happen to the chain if you didn't have a bunch of full nodes checking the blocks the miners create

Miners would keep other miners in check despite listening nodes, because that's what already happens. You faggots are completely irrelevant.

>>17424654
>Any computer that connects to the Bitcoin network is called a node

Don't go anywhere, I can only post on pic per post and what you said requires a brainletpost as well.

>>17406284
>miners are just wasting their time if our nodes reject their blocks
Simply not true. That would imply listening nodes are vital to the network for Bitcoin to work and they aren't. They aren't even a consideration.

As long as miners are accepting each others blocks and building on top of them Bitcoin goes on without a hitch. Actual nodes do not need your listening node even in the slightest.

>>16827792
>more of the muh nodes

Enjoy losing, I mean that from the bottom of my heart.

>>16580076
>unironically posting Bitcoin Judas

>>14410822
>bico.media
Based and BSV pilled.

>>14410824
I see some of you have been reading what nChain has been putting out there. I also agree with their definition of a node.

>>14100154
Yeah and nChain is attempting to change the definition of what makes a node as well.

>>13768857
Fucking this

kek

>>13491438
>steals Bitcoin by following the whitepaper

baka

>>13487826
>you wont be getting my BTC nigger
>grasping onto a complete shitcoin

My BTC stack is still too big. Its taking me too long to DCA into SV desu.

Literally all they had to do was read the whitepaper.

>one weird trick to change money forever

>>13470694
CSW defines what a node is clear as day and you faggots still resist.

>inb4 nChain propaganda