/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>50572768
The other side of this is they just decide fuck it were hyper inflating this bitch.

>>29969504
Not really. It's more like the dotcom shit of the 2000s, where if you had "cyber" in your company name, it was worth an instant $1B valuation. You can see the same thing happening now with EVs, Green energy, and Palantir-like debt-ridden speculative tech shit.

The difference between our current bubble and both the great recession and the dotcom bubble is the Infinite QE the Fed is doing. They are doing pic related to the Bond market, which also inflates the equity markets, because there is nowhere else to put the money.
So it's not retail consoomers pumping, so it is absolutely irrelevant if they are on 2x margin or 200x or what your shoeshine boy (or uber driver) told you this morning.

The problem with this is that there is absolutely no way to tell what the crash catalyst will be.
"Generals are always prepared to fight the last war"

>>29913061
It's actually not QE that causes inflation. It's govt overspending, especially that retarded "Stimulus". Two thirds of last years inflation was caused by the previous stimmy.
The asset market is completely decoupled, and fearing "Weimar hyperinflation" because of inflated stock prices is pretty idiotic.
It does increase the gap between the wealthy and the poor, but it does not really cause indlation.

>>29836400

>>29327097
You have to have more information than most people on the market, i.e. an edge over the marrket.
Pro tip: everyone looks at the same graph, looking for patterns is not.

Watch this first:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=72Pq5zKEi_g&t=600s

Basically you have to do deep research, or at least have some anon do it for you. Everything else is gambling.

What do you guys think when does the inflation hit the normies?

Anyone who held classic investment accounts instead of equities is going to be FUCKED.