/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>9442836

>>9364351
Hi /r/btc

>>9197810
But LN will provide cheap payments. Just like Satoshi predicted.

>>9093074
A simple and stupid solution.

>>9088168
Great comeback.

>>9076181
Yeah, Blockstream is relentless. Check out pic related, wherein you'll find proof that Cockstream was infiltrating BitcoinTalk as early as 2011!

Bitcoin Cash will win EPIC STYLE!

>>9065574
Segwit adoption, batching, and LN will keep fees lower, but yes, the plan is for on chain fees to increase and for the blockchain to become a settlement layer. That was always the plan, you were misled by that histrionic faggot Roger Ver and others who had the wrong idea about what Bitcoin will become. It will still be a currency, but the blockchain cannot scale without losing its decentralized properties. LN is a decent way to get smaller value transactions, with slightly increased trust, while not compromising the base layer.

>>9053789
>>9053796
>>9053816
>>9053853
>>9053936
>>9053952
>>9053989

>>9044624
We get it OP, you're a retard.

>>9026178

>>8973044
bcash is a hardfork, segwit was a softfork. The softfork is the backwards compatible fork, and therefore is the continuation fork. bcash implemented replay protection further solidifying itself as a fork and not the original chain.

>look into it

You have no idea what you're talking about.

>>8962621
The median txn fee for BTC is now less than $1.

https://bitinfocharts.com/comparison/bitcoin-median_transaction_fee.html#log

Reasons:
1. End of network spamming
2. Segwit adoption
3.Txn batching

Blockchains txns have dipped down, but this is intentional design.

https://bitinfocharts.com/comparison/bitcoin-transactions.html#log

Feel free to end yourself at any time.

>>8829242
>Friendly reminder that Blockstream was infiltrating BitcoinTalk in 2010

I hope this Hal guy dies of some incurable disease.

>>8810906
>The absolute delusion.

>>8792504

>>8738442
>because everyone who cares about bitcoin being bitcoin already left for cash. The remaining core people care about being able to censor and track payments. They want to run forced fractional reserves. They want business as usual. Sure they could upgrade but if they do, they acknowledge that bitcoin cash was right all along. All the big miners are in bch, all the big devs, the original community. We are all just milking money from banks and noobs using bitcoin-legacy until it's time to start the party.

The absolute delusion.

>>8732863
Blockstream employees were already infiltrating BitcoinTalk in 2010

Pic Related. I hope this Hal guy dies of some incurable disease. Fucking Corecucks.

>>8703841
>>8704109
>>8704297
>>8704352
>>8704394
>>8704399
>>8704964
>>8705684
>>8705735
>>8705784
>>8705791
>>8705850
>>8705870


Friendly reminder that Blockstream infiltrated Bitcoin as early as 2010!

Satoshi agrees aswell

>>8462288
AHAHAHAHHAHA

>>8428306
Check out pic related. Blockstream was already infiltrating Bitcoin Talk in 2010.

>>8344790
I'd probably give slightly more weight to his opinions, but still assess the two projects (Bitcoin and bcash) on the basis of pragmatic reality, long-term viability, and the quality of their respective developer communities.

kys btw.

>>8168357
>been subverted and its use as a currency deliberately crippled.

I know you are just a pajeet shill, but this notion is entirely fabricated and retarded. You will misinterpret how things unfold because of that and therefore you'll miss out on opportunities.

There was a corporate takeover attempt of Bitcoin. It was shut down in November when S2x failed and was subsequently revealed to be a buggy p.o.s. The men behind the takeover wrote a public apology and have since been flaccidly throwing hissy fits because they didn't get their way.

You got psy-oped.

>>8138140
It will help keep fees manageable during the transition to LN. Fees will continue to climb over the long term as they replace coinbase inflation for miners.

Inflation served as a hidden or obscured fee, but the real txn cost will become increasingly apparent. This is okay. Bitcoin does not need to have low-txn cost for on chain txns. Using Bitcoin is worth these fees given the state of the world and what's going to happen this century.

What I actually believe is well-summarized here:

https://medium.com/@rusty_lightning/the-three-economic-eras-of-bitcoin-d43bf0cf058a