/biz/ - Business & Finance

Google? Already collabed.
IBM? Already collabed.
Intel? Already fucking collabed.
The fucking EU? Already. Collabed.

Iexec is so light years ahead that as soon as the market realizes it, its already over. $1000 per.
I just wonder why so many people are waiting for that point of no return for validation to hold.
With validation, comes this project skyrocketing to unforeseen, unfathomable levels.

>>23110736
pic related. Just look it up, give it 20min

Why is digital oil not mooning?

>>22676651
>>22676705
>>22676712
>>22676727
based just sold 100k

>EU partnership

What's next? China partnership?

>>21855574
Yes, pic related

>>21854881
You don't you ass faggot, since you'll lose everything you have, because day trading is for retards who don't know how this game works. Instead you should invest in iExec RLC literally the next Chainlink. If you don't trust me, that's great, but I recommend you that you invest 3-5 hours of your time and check out the following:

Website: https://iex.ec/
Medium: https://medium.com/iex-ec
Twitter: https://twitter.com/iEx_ec
Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCwWxZWvKVHn3CXnmDooLWtA

After you've done that consider how much the following are worth; AWS Amazon, Microsoft Azure, Google Cloud

And consider that all of the above need big as data centers to run their operations, which are expensive. And iExec RLC does not need data centers to run, since it decentralized...

If you still don't get it after this extensive retard proof post than you're not made to make money and you should stay poor, because once you get rich you won't know what to do with the money like most people and you'll go into a downwards spiral of depression

>>21820291
It's really not, just buy pic related. If it's not just DYOR please. I beg you, research it. Give it 5 hours of research and you'll be 100% convinced in the next x40 LINK.

This is the next LINK guys, undeniable

I'll tell you about the next x40 lol. pic related.
Read this thread >>21264492

>>21496153
Yes 10k is enough. With 10k you'll be rich beyond your wildest dreams

It went from 0.40 cents to over 2 USD... what the fuck is wrong with you? It just takes a few days off and then it continues

>>21360554
RLC seems nice

>>21350231
It clearly is digital oil, since Ehereum (and other blockchains) are machines and you need oil in order for the machine to run efficiently. Since RLC scales anything.

>>21267015

1) These blockchain IaaS projects all remind me of Siacoin (SC) which is/was great in theory, but totally impractical for Enterprise use because of the IP/copyright issue. There's no compliant way to decentralize data storage on a large scale.

I don't get what the problem here is. How do you mean no compliant way?

2) Companies can't afford to commingle with data that can expose them to risk

Everything is in a TEE which makes it impossible to read data from other people. You can work on the data, but you don't know what the fuck you're doing and what you're calculating

3) You can already reserve spot instances in AWS data centers for pennies on the dollar. What exactly is being delivered? Tokens for what exactly? Serious question.

As I already pointed out, when you buy at AWS you pay for their data center upkeep and everything that makes a data center run. RLC only charges you for the raw computing power itself and because it's a token on ETH the ETH blockchain provides the trustless enviroment you need in order for you to feel safe that people don't fuck with your data. Also TEE enclaves make it so that people who compute/work on your data don't know what the data represent or what they're computing and they can't temper it or send you false data back.

>>21039088
>only 1 million people can have access to the world computer with 81 units of iexec power

>>21000235
>>20999403
If you know, you know

How were we rocketing to $2.00 on a fucking spaceship and then slammed into a wall and have seen red ever since?
It just doesnt add up. Sorry for being sherlocking holmes here on my sleuth shit but uhhhh
We're clearly being manipulated, no?

>>20591934
Dude it's on iOS and Google app stores. Just search for "4chan Official Uncensored Boards"

You have to scroll down, it has a bad rating because people say nigger here

>>20583555
Checked you mad cunt

8.9K BARON HERE

>>20508945
Did it seriously pump back into the 1.70s?? Fuckkkkkk I was hoping to buy a shit ton at $1.50 or lower in the morning..... FUCK KIKE BANKS AND THEIR SLOW ASS TRANSFERS I'VE BEEN TRYING TO BUY MORE SINCE IT WAS $1.01 DAYS AGO

And even smaller farms and home rigs. iExec has so much more to offer them for their computing power!!
And BTC would 100% TANK if even 20% of miners switched their GPU's over to being iExec Workers!!!

Oh and WORKER DROP TOMORROW BOYS SHITS GETTING REAL THEN MICROSOFT ANNOUNCEMENT ON THE 30TH!!!

LET'S GO IRON HAND RLCHADS!!!

"iExec has released its new version V4, which solves the scalability problem of blockchain applications, and introduces transactions with zero fees."

Can someone redpill me on this? Did iexec already solve the scalability issue? Are they using a layer 2 protocol? What are the details on that?

>>20459444
CHEKD AND KEKD