/biz/ - Business & Finance

>Circumstantial part 2

>50528802
>he genuinely thinks this is what happened

>50509045
>he doesn't know about swaps or Brazil
Lol your the pilpul anon aren't you?

That reminds me, we need to update this with the new figures. Even the self reported figures show shorts are fucked from months ago and it's got worse for them.

>>50291467
>Let's say that shorts still exist
All public data on the public positions, without have any of the swaps or internalized data which is 90% of where retails trades get routed. They are actually worse now than when this was compiled, again I'll state "self reported & self regulated" aka they lied

If only you did a modicum of research rather than listening to idiots on the TV

>>50285704
For a start, plus it's also out of date and about 1m more worse for them. This is only including shares owned by retail not in street name

>>50209578
Yes, the ones they "report" shows they are still fucked

>inb4 sources

All from public data

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

WE ALSO KNOW ABOUT SWAPS HOLDING EVEN MORE SHARES

MAN YOUR SO BAD AT THIS

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

>>50208836
Refute this then gimp

Keep

Seething
>Seething
Seething
>Seething
Seething
>Seething
Seething
>Seething

NGMI

>>50208742
kek, you literal brainlets make me laugh. Over a year of info comes out and the best you can manages is "Durr NPC"

Go on argue this and while your at it, how much did you lose on BTC?

>>49708624
Fun fact: GME is objectively doing better than nearly everything else, crypto especially included. Picrel is from the shareholder’s meeting a couple weeks ago, even with the official numbers shorts can’t close and will cause an infinity squeeze when they try
Remember this when we buy our space lambos and you’ve moved into your WEF-approved pod

>>49556921
Assuming “apes” don’t sell, insiders can’t without advance notice, and a significant fraction of institutional holding are the original lenders so they can’t sell either. Depending how specifically that breaks down, it’s likely that just the shorts that everyone admits to existing can’t find enough shares to close, nevermind the ones that are speculated about
This is the most lopsided bet in history. The risk is about $130 and the upside is only limited by when/if governments try to shut it down. Your sui stack is a fractional share in RobinHood, and even that will get you an insane return before they sell for you again

>>49512426
Ok sure

>>49484845
Ok

>>49465770
Someone needs to post picrel there and ask them to explain how a short squeeze isn’t fucking inevitable

>>49447967
Literally infinity, and that’s using the “trust me bro, these are totally legit” numbers that got filed with the SEC. Given that we know with 99.99999999% certainty most of them are absolute bullshit of the kind only extreme Talmudic witchcraft can conjure, I can assume that the actual price will be a second-level infinity of sorts

>>49434025
They’re already fucked. This tends to get slid, but a cringeminer did math on the official numbers (see picrel), shorts still can’t close - and this is being generous and assuming nobody is lying about anything
Imagine how bad it is in reality where we know the SI is laughably underreported

>>49417810
That was the Thorp post (I think linked somewhere further up itt). Regarding this one, SHFs are completely fucked, see picrel for the math even if everything is honestly reported (excelreporting.gif)

They can't get out from the "current" short interest lol imagine how bad it really is