/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>28949753
i'm only a 100 LINK baglet :(

funds are safu

>>26221662

Are you retarded? Do you have low IQ? Or are you just counterattacking our arguments so we spoonfeed you and validate your intentions of holding Link?

BTC going to 200k would push the market to 7 trillion. Even if Link has 5% dominance (which is very conservative for how important it is); it would put it at $750. Even if bitcoin doesnt reach 200k, lets say 100k ; it would still be more than $300. And even if BTC doesn’t pump, chainlink had always had its own independent pump.

Also, forget about all that crap that people compare market value against companies; this is a different VOLUME. If institutions decided to utilize chainlink and obtain Links.. they would buy large amounts and pump the price. Today’s volume cant handle institutional money. Look at the bids and tell me if an institution can just go and buy a large stack. OTC? Sure but there wont be enough if the demand is high and holders are already staking.

Up 69% this month this shitcoin doesn’t ever move

just zoom out

>>26064620