/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>58503795
>>I hold both
Incredibly based, anon. I once read in a children’s book that you shouldn’t put all your eggs in one basket. After all, we know that the best way to trigger a short squeeze in a particular stock is to buy a bunch of different stocks

>>58484985
APE NO FIGHT APE!

>>58482371
>having fun
I find it hard to believe that anyone who wasted their money on bloodbath and beyond is having anything other than a mental breakdown

>>56201023

>>55190330
>i wish someone had told me this
I told everyone this about a billion times

>>55057384
Shills couldn’t be happier seeing you throw your money away on a dead stock

>>54303763
No, bro, you have to spread your money thin across multiple investments. The best way to squeeze GME is to buy other stocks.

>>54264797
But anon, it’s cheaper and will squeeze first…

>>53825962
Rookie mistake

>>53736743
Don’t make me update the starter pack

>>53630673
No, bro, you don’t understand. You should be buying BBBY because it’s cheaper and will squeeze first

>>53524449
>aoe no fight ape!
Where have I heard that before? You’re the one trying to sow division by convincing people to buy two stocks instead of one. If I have one dollar and put 50 cents into two different stocks, what do they call that? Oh yeah, division!

>>53452955
>Cos the faggot who screeches about it being a distraction has been jannied about 30 times in the last 3 days, multiple of his devices have been range banned probably. Also the shills logged off at market close
I haven’t been jannied in like two years. Still here. Still making distraction fags seethe

>>53402379
Didn’t stop LRC from creating a bunch of bagholders. GME is the only play

>>53351280
>w
Because it’s cheaper and will squeeze first

>>53307058
But anon, it’s going to squeeze first and it’s cheaper

>>53241900

>>53215197
Because it’s cheaper and will moon first
>source?
There is no source. It’s retarded cope

>>53195419
Other than shorting the stock, trying to get us to buy other shit is the only weapon they have. It works on stupid people. There are actual real people in this thread right now who have lost money on all three distraction investments. It’s very simple, people. This is a GME thread, therefore anyone who pushes anything other than GME is a shill

>>53105768
It couldn’t be more obvious that BBBY isn’t related to GME in any way. There is no evidence to support the theory and all of the evidence we have goes against it. Ryan sold, said he did so because his opinion of the company changed, and one of his appointed board members just left. Besides all of that, why the fuck would a video game company want to acquire bed bath and beyond? It makes zero fucking sense. The only “evidence” BBBaggies have are qtard interpretations of joke tweets. It’s the same kind of mental gymnastics AMC baggies used to convince themselves there would be a GME x AMC merger. Much of the “logic” BBBY baggies come up with to support their bias is straight up AMC nigger cope. January will come and go with no merger and these faggots will still be here trying to pawn off their bags. At what point is it too much and you BBBY bags are finally able to admit that it’s over? Your CFO jumped out a window ffs. I literally cannot even imagine a bigger sell signal than that

>>52873248
>As far as I am concerned, it is my side play
Don’t make me update the starter pack, Keithoid

Friendly reminder that RC stated in the interview that he sold BBBY because his opinion of the company changed. BBBY is OFFICIALLY no longer related to GME. Anyone pushing BBBY in these threads is doing so in bad faith and should be sneeded on sight

>>52545892
>In general, it’s rare to see a company go from aggressively repurchasing shares to losing a lot a of money, and so, when I saw that, and I saw the results, my views changed of the business, and ultimately, I sold.
Kek BBBaggies

>>52387300
You clearly have no idea who I am. No one has put as much effort as I have into preventing you people from losing money on AMC, LRC, BBBY etc. if anything, I am the most benevolent poster in these threads and you should be grateful that someone like me cares enough to try stopping you from buying Keith’s bags. For the record, I am not 45 or Boyardee. Don’t fall for Keith’s gaslighting