/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>4352849
Reminder that OP is a faggot and he likes to suck Craig's fat microdick every night whie he calls him filthy Pajeet

>>4275521
shhh dont tell /biz/, im still accumulating my bags

this is a $1 coin by the end of year, screencap this

also checkem

>>3662697
I'll take that as a yes.

>>3612044
>>3612056
>>3612079
>>3612103
>>3612106

Fuck off Ponzi Scammers

>>3297028
>Stopped reading there
Convenient way of saying "I have been BTFO and have no arguments"

>>3217700
Holy shit are you really intellectually incapable og grapsing the simplest notion? Is this the power of pajeet intellectuals?
>mining generates bitcoins AND processes Txs
yes, but the processes are distinct from one another. Miners earn by mining new coins, and they include transactions in the mined block to earn a fee from the transaction.
>If bitcoin cash production is hyperinflating because of the retargeting mechanism that means that blocks (AND THEREFORE Txs) are being processed more rapidly
yes
> If the blocks were full then this would cause the blockchain to grow faster (AS YOU CLAIMED), but if the blocks are not full then it makes no difference
Even if blocks are empty you generate new coins by the simple act of finding the block you fucking moron. The number of transactions in the block does not change that fact at all you fucking cashcuck pajeet.
>\end of story
why is it so hard for you astroturfers to admit you are wrong and you are full of shit? 2012 my ass, I bet you didn't even know about bitcoin two months ago you kike faggot
>I'm not wasting any more of my time trying to explain this to dunning-kruger retards
lmao pot calling the kettle black

>>2969375
>The difference is the Bancholders will be poor due to holding this shitcoin
says increasingly nervous nobanc for the 30th time this week.
Bancor will never be as cheap as it is now, buy now or buy my bags at 1000x, it's your choice ;)