/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>12195105
It doesn't. It just says what the income would be if X throughput on network.

>part 2

Regarding the "(de)centralised" argument, I cannot comment on Waltonchains solution as I haven't seen it with my eyes (and I only believe what I can compile and test myself), but what I can tell is our (=Ambrosus's) plan is certainly not limited to a centralised solution and we're strongly aiming to have a fully decentralised solution. The reason why we first released centralised access to Ambrosus is purely practical as it's the only way we can offer the performance / functionality required by the companies we work with (because of the current limitations in Ethereum and most other blockchain technology we've tested). For example, I'd love to see the performance and flexibility of waltonchain's serialisation solution or simply how they actually provision their RFIDs on production lines - these should be the crispy questions and comparisons that the companies we work with are asking daily and so are we! ''

>>10528002

>>10514589

SEE AMBROS !!

THIS IS HOW YOU SHUT BRAINLETS UP !
YOU CAN DO IT TOO !

>>10384184

Ahahah so that was it.

My guess is that volume is too low for those fucker fudders to accumulate without making it moon.

You've been at it for weeks, you must really want those masternodes .