/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>54289488
>and they were like "ok" and left

>>54228932
>and has only slept with 2 other guys before me
lol women are never honest about the number of guys they've slept with. you always multiply the number they tell you buy 10-15 and then you'll get the real number

>>54078909
Kek. Soon that won't even be an option

>>52387759
How many times did we try to warn you about crypto custody?

Did AI alone cause this LUNC pump?
This isn't organic.
>literally
High-frequency-trading is ultimately autonomous, for just like no human can surpass a machine in a game of chess, Japanese Go, nukes launching or, arguably, any (other), one cannot outwit nor outpace, an AI network, whether in outward competition or cooperation (for they're, for that purpose, identical, i.e, non-human).
This black swam (arguably a colossal bait that will generate a historic baghodling and be the ground zero of either a bullrun or - more likely - a bearrun) seems to have originated with a single "God candle" that followed by a few other, cleverly outpricing many retail buyers, allowing a hidden party a significant advantage in immediate gains and most likely a psychological one, that seems aimed at regaining confidence in the cryotosphere short to mid term. Regardless of whom these actors might be, the actual operation is most likely carried out by AI, for it's the most efficient known tool available. Yet, once spawned and sprawled, such trading strings increase something close, or even beyond ,exponentially, in complexity. Nobody can follow these up. So, ultimately, all trades are now managed by data coming through AI or directly by AI altogether (for all practical reasons, these also are identical). We are reacting, not responding; led, not leading, automatons, not autonomous, traders.
AI is baghodling us all.
>when capitulation

>>12389586
i'd love a photo of that spot today

Bitcoin Cash is Bitcoin.

>>9281769
>only down 9%

>>4853023
no w8 i need to accumulate more, please don't go up fuck