/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>26039228
Okay, let's compare hash rates.

https://bitinfocharts.com/comparison/zcash-hashrate.html

https://etherscan.io/chart/hashrate

That's rate, Ethereum has over x40...

300 / 7.6

That's fucking ROUDNING down, it's closer probably to almost x50 the hashing power. That means if the gov wants to, they will and can 51% attack that piece of shit. You're not understanding my point, anything... and I mean any privacy token that runs on it's own chain is liable to be 51% attacked if it doesn't have the hashing power. It's why BTC is what it's worth and why I keep insisting privacy on ETH is as close as it gets to the real deal.

>And it doesn't matter how many people use z addresses because when a tx is unshielded it goes back into the haystack
>haystack
>haystack
>haystack
>haystack

That's a tumbler my guy, it just uses the entire chain as it's source, which is impressive... certainly... but it requires usage as you just stated. That means that tx history is stored somewhere, it requires usage, it requires nodes and it can be delisted.

https://www.coindesk.com/bittrex-to-delist-privacy-coins-monero-dash-and-zcash#:~:text=Bittrex%20announced%20Friday%20it%20will,%2C%20at%2023%3A00%20UTC.

Again, fucking read dude.

>>26037783
>Again, your privacy MUST BE ON CHAIN. AND IT MUST BE ON A BIG ENOUGH CHAIN, THEY CANNOT FUCK WITH.

Zcash is just a poor man's Monero. And Monero has issues for the said above reasons.

Three simple facts.
1. BUCC is on Ethereum.
2. BUCC api txs are private and it hides info from etherscan and other tools.
3. It can scale with other contracts and lives on the chain forever, it cannot be "destroyed" off of Ethereum. It cannot be delisted because it lives on DEXs. It is immutable in the fullest sense.

>>22151054
Not possible, technical reasons but also Ethereum's gas fees.