/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>4483026
>again, it's a big IF.
That's the risk. But it can only go to $0.00 and if so, I can live with that. What I couldn't live with is seeing this thing go 100x or 1000x (which it will if they pull this off) and not being a part of it.

Anyway, I don't know the ins and outs of it but word is they're pretty close. But even if it doesn't work out, the hype alone is likely to drive the price up right until they admit defeat. Most coins in the top 100 don't even have a working product yet, nor do they have a product as unique and valuable as chainlink

>>4467653
This. I always see people posting shit like "It's not going anywhere for the next few months so I'll ride the BTC pump right now".

This is retarded because 1. You don't know when BTC will stop rising. 2. You don't know when LINK will start rising

All you can be sure of is that LINK will rise AT SOME POINT. But thinking you're smarter than the market and trying to time it is a recipe for suicide. See >>4466164

I learned this lesson the hard way. Made my stack in ETH by buying back in February/March. Spent all year chasing pumps and trying to time the market. Sometimes it worked out, sometimes it didn't. I'm now in exactly the same place as I'd be if I just held ETH this whole time.

If you've done your research how is it hard to be patient? This is the closest to a sure thing as you're likely to get

Pic related is the ETH chart. As long as you weren't playing with pocket money a decent investment would have been enough for you to retire off

>>4465979
The patient will be rewarded.

But yeah it'd be great if you knew where the bottom is and increased the stack along the way.