/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>9638628
"A divorce judge will first look at whether the prenuptial agreement is unfair as compared to what the court would do without the agreement. For example, has one of the spouses given up property or alimony rights that would have been available during a divorce without the existence of a prenuptial agreement? If there is a significant difference in what the court would do with and without the existence of the agreement, then the court can determine that the agreement is unfair."

An article in Forbes also said that a prenuptial agreement can be thrown out because it's "lopsided."

From my perspective as a man, the only point of a damned prenuptial agreement is that there is SUPPOSED to be a "significant difference in what the court would do with and without the existence of the agreement."

If I was going to get married I'd like to have alimony out of the question and clearly limit the amount of child support I'd be liable for. But apparently asking my potential wife to agree not to come after me for alimony is unfair?

Also, "common law marriage in Florida no longer exists as an option for cohabiting couples

I refuse to put myself in a position where I am liable to pay a woman I despise a bunch of money.