/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>54954833
>The bankers would be too afraid to allow the lower classes to suffer

>>50635608
>When they think communism, they think soviet union or Mao's China. Never revolutionary Catalonia.
>unironically it's not real communism

>>50615891
>Communism is literally about reducing poverty, education for all, healthcare for all. And it achieves those things amazingly.
Meanwhile, in reality

>>50281325
Damage control post, no sources, claims things already shown to be bullshit by things posted ITT. Schacht completely disapproved of Hitler, Ley, and Reinhardt's policies on economics and even he admitted:

>“The frequent argument that Hitler found the unemployed population work and bread solely through a massive build-up of the armed forces is untenable, when the actual statistics are examined,” the historian Ralf Wittrich observed. 127 Schacht confirmed this when he stated, “The elimination of unemployment in Germany... succeeded without rearmament." 128 (Klüver, Max, Vom Klassenkampf zur Volksgemeinschaft, p. 58)

"Invaded countries" were either land taken by post war sanctions, or places populated largely by ethnic Germans who were being discriminated against.

>Hitler scheduled joint plebiscites in Austria and Germany for April 10, 1938. Both populations decided on whether to incorporate the two countries into a single state. The people of Austria cast 99.73 percent of their ballots in favor of Anschluss with Germany. The Germans voted 99.08 percent for unification. (Post, Walter, Die Ursachen des Zweiten Weltkrieges, p. 217)

Not sure where you got the give the state their money at 0% from so I can't really address that because it's clear nonsense. Germany was under economic sanctions from all over the world by all Jewish controlled countries because they knew Hitler was going to be a problem (see front cover of the Daily Express March 24th 1933). I've also never come across a source showing starvation in Germany. If you want to talk about starvation, you can go read about pic related.

>>50129101
I wonder where this could be going.

>>49811739
Guess that excuses the white genocide then.

>>49774583
>Imagine thinking that the people getting robbed are actually rich, and not middle classes that actually provide services that these poor parasites need.

This, it's 1917 all over again and the fake proles are just as retarded as last time. They're going to wipe out the real people of value in America and hand it to the class they hate just like they did in every other communist "revolution". It's all so tiresome.

>>49747273
>A literally famine is a genocide cause we hate commies.

It was genocide you braindead retard.

>>49526669
I do read books mainly on national socialist economics and communist societies in general and I'd say the fact that there are unironic communists around today is a bigger sign nobody reads, including university professors.

>>49384636
>removing millions of families at gunpoint

You lot would know a thing or two about that, wouldn't you? How do you fight power structures like the global banking system without having your own nation and army free from outside influence? Your idea is reverse brainwashing the leftists into blaming billionaires, isn't it? That's literally a modern Russian revolution. The upper class convince the lower class to murder the middle class so the upper class can take all their shit and easily rule over the retards that are left. To threaten a power structure, you need another one, and it better be a pretty fucking good one, because I agree with you, any nation attempting to break free of debt based finance will face a full blown assault from the rest of the world, just like last time.