/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>6009097

>Sergey is typing ...

God bless you based money belly save us from this crash.

>tfw LINK will hit 11.97k sats today and it will have outperformed bcore

Fudders, comment?

>>5829753

Sergey said that SWIFT member banks pay clearninghouses 10-20 million dollars a year for bond interest rate data. Assume Chainlink cuts that in half. Across 1k nodes thats $5k a year.

Another number we know is zeppelin dapps are managing 1.5 billion in smartcontracts. If Chainlink charges .1% of the contract value that's another 1.5 million, or $1.5k per node per year.

From there you could try and determine rouglly how much link you would have to have to run a node, assuming the ROI would settle somewhere, maybe 5%.

Initially it might be ugly, but if they launch with big implementations right off the bat, it's definitely conceivable the tokens would have real nonspeculative value immediately. Also keep in mind dapps and smartcontracts are in their infancy and zeppelinOS is highly likely to get much bigger in the very near future.

I also can't speak to contract staking, I'm not sure how that would affect the ecosystem.

Sergey shuts down the network after SWIFT falls through and it's most widespread adoption is assassination smart contracts using obituary APIs.

Is this true? I thought SWIFT was just a meme? Did sergey seriously retool his company (SmartContract/Chainlink) just for SWIFT?

>>5754722

It's still a similar amount of volume. They also serve different audiences it feels like .

>>5723188