/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>20786922
>>20786822
Midwit syndrome in action. I'll spoonfed you half retards because I'm in a good mood. Anything can be a currency as long as it has value, longevity and transportability, it doesn't need to claim to be one whatever that's supposed to mean. Historically it has applied to shells, rice, grains, dates, gold and silver of course, promissory notes and as of right now law enforced pieces of paper.

It doesn't matter what the intent of Sergey is, and it doesn't matter what label is being applied to link as of right now, do you understand?

>>20705809
>I actually don't have my source(s) for the recessive genes thing. But basically you are right about that, but that leads to those genes being selected against in more homogenous populations
Agreed, that explains how Icelandic people can all be cousins while having healthy children. There is actually a study showing that it's healthier fornoeople from Iceland to have children with cousins than with strangers.

>>20705809
>I also agree with this in a way but you aren't considering that the high IQ elite of Africans are like 110 IQ and are basically average when competing in the same society as high IQ elite Asians. Just to give the most extreme example.
My opinion is that longterm it won't matter. If you take the US where I can assume the elite black people are 110+, longterm the lower part of the elite will be eaten by the middle and low classes while the smaller higher black elite who is 130+ will get to keep its standing, probably racemixing with high and middle class white and other minorities, getting some new genes in the process that will get selected through whatever selective pressure impose themselves in the future.

It's difficult to predict of the black elite of the elite is going to maintain its existence as one of the dominant groups or if they are just going to get absorbed into the white elite by the process of racemixing, or maybe they will racemix enough to be 90% white but they will still consider themselves black and will use this identity to form a cohesive group, only time will tell.

>and yes I'm somewhat of a linker myself; how could you tell?
You're a visionary with a good grasp of evolutions theory and you're posting on /biz/.

>>20357896
You must understand that longterm only the stacking reward will determine the price of link.
So the price will no matter what be about 5% longterm when the price stabilize. More and people will buy, making the price rise and the % drop. Less and people will sell as less than 5% isn't enough to take the risk of stacking.

But that's not the % you need to guess, that's the stacking reward per link per year in absolute number. For exemple if it's $1, once deducted let's say 50% for the node operator we have $0.5 per link per year, making link 10 dollars each if we assume the logical 5% that the market will tend too longterm no matter what.

Now if link manage to capture a sizable amount of the derivative market, we can imagine much more than $1 per link per year, even 0.1% of the derivative market would make almost all of present day linkies insanely rich, if they hold.

Now will link actually capture any amount of the derivative market penis that all a pipedream? Time will tell.

>>20134361
Yep that confirms it, you have a combination of asperger with an only slightly higher than average intelligence, smart enough to see that reality is kinda shit but too dumb to do anything about it, and too dumb to make your autism useful for yourself and society.

As a fellow short man I have nothing but compassion for you but I can't help you with your problems.

>>19991612
It was luck to be at the right place at the right time. Good luck or bad luck not sure yet