/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>23198571
>Talking Point #425

>>13838461
Garbage wager terms. Should be at least 1 to 0.0125 odds to be even remotely fair given current price ratio.

>>13761454
>implying tether matters
>shilling ETH
>Szabo is Satoshi
So much trash in this post, I don't even know where to begin.

>>13550452
>David Gerard
>https://davidgerard.co.uk/blockchain/about/
>"He is a volunteer spokesman for Wikipedia, and is on the board of the RationalMedia Foundation, host of skeptical wiki RationalWiki.org."
Oh, look another parasite

>>13463411
>Reddit spacing
Never fails. KYS shill, you don't belong here.

>>13357156
>destroy the entire cryptosphere
Now here's the fun part where you explain why such a hysterical notion would even pop into your head if you aren't a woman or a faggot. Seriously, imagine being so afraid that a single man is capable of such a thing.

>>13339225
>If I don't get it, everyone else must be stupid
Into the trash it goes.

>>12979612
You know jack shit about the actual statutes if you think that a tiny amount of CP downloaded as part of a much larger stream of data is going to be a problem in the civilized world. If that wasn't the case, BTC or any other immutable ledger would not be viable. Period. End of story.
In b4
>it's easier to upload raw data to BSV than BTC and that makes all the difference!
No it doesn't. It means exactly jack shit if you look at the actual statues and case law.
What's more. The fact that shills like you are harping on this in exactly the same way the buttcoiners were in 2011/2012 should give you pause. You are nothing but the same breed of retard, except instead of being a no-coiner you are either a clueless late adopter or someone with zero intellectual integrity.

>>12723177
Liar liar pants on fire.
Done with you for now. Any anon who is either not a complete brainlet or can do simple research will see that you are an even worse liar than you claim CSW to be.
I don't even like Craig, but the absolute insanity of the people who attack him day in and day out is something in his favor. Something about the CSW-derangement headcases like you sets off my bullshit radar and makes me more inclined to give CSW the benefit of the doubt and I know I'm not the only one.

>>12671732
>t. Guy who was not around in the early days and has no idea what kind of a guy Gavin was/is.
I also like how you completely ignore that it is just as possible to con oneself with evidentiary standards that are too strict as it is with those that are too loose. High-pass and low-pass filters both cut off information.
CSW derangement nutcases like you are essentially the fedora atheists of the crypto world, autistically clinging to an oversimplified framework of understanding that completely misses the bigger picture.

>>11400951
>muh corporations

>>10658324
Jesus christ look at these people who barely understand how any of this shit works yet swallow the "Muh Bcash" propoganda hook line and sinker. Serious investors take note. Moments like these in history where you have the opportunity to extract value from information dislocations are not that common. This is like a second chance at buying bitcoin in 2012 for anyone that is paying attention.

>>9279751
Ahahahaha. You got an argument there, somewhere buddy?
>Pajeet
>Trash
>????
You realize that oozing salt and desperation is just hurting your cripplecoin, right?
>>9279809
Non-sequitur of the year right here, folks.

>>9136551
>miners are scum
LOL, you morons can't even keep your own narrative straight. How convenient you seem to have forgotten how you demonized the miners during the UASF sockpuppet campaign.
The miners are going to ultimately be the ones who save us as more hashpower moves to Bitcoin Cash.

>>9097095
>Doesn't know that bitcoin can scale to GB block sizes using current tech without affecting the fundamentals of the system.
>Doesn't understand that miners, exchanges and merchants will be more than happy to shell out for extra bandwidth and storage to participate in a network making them billions of dollars a month.
These are the technocrats that think they understand how to "steer" bitcoin against what the market actually wants.
Don't be this guy, anons. These socialist technocrat types are exactly the kind of people who are getting steamrolled by the juggernaut of a true free market money.

>>8997898
Good lord. There are at least two clear arguments in this thread that refute your retarded pet talking point if you were capable of cogent thought. This thread is hilarious, but honestly give it up already, if you continue to embarrass yourself further the cringe will start to outweigh the comedy factor.

>Who needs index funds when you can put all your eggs in the GE basket?
https://seekingalpha.com/article/4114666

Is this guy insane, or is there actually upside at GE? Anyone calling a bottom and buying this dip?

Discuss.