/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>20068895
V-ID has partnered with HOWDOO UDOO, FTM, and LTO. All pump and dump scams. The reseller partners are either shell companies or outright scams.

Acronis owns the patent for blockchain validation technology in the United States (and it is enforceable if V-ID does any business in the United States, regardless of bagholder claims): https://patents.google.com/patent/US10114980B2/

Make a clone of V-ID and own 100% of the token supply: https://www.udacity.com/course/blockchain-developer-nanodegree--nd1309

VIDT is an illegal security token (and not a utility token) and if SEC hears about it this shit is going straight to zero. They sold VIDT at ICO with the promise that they will convert to VIDS (shares in the company down the line). They also hinted at Binance listing being locked in and other shady shenanigans, such as unlocking supposedly locked tokens to pay a woman to namedrop VIDT during an online Powerpoint presentation. They (meaning you) paid over $10,000 for it. In other words, team is dumping tokens left and right without the "team" technically dumping. I mean, they're "gently putting it into circulation".

>>17538800

>>16799947

>>16598702
>>16598578
Can you be any more of an obvious shill? Acronis is going to obliterate V-ID and the devs will stop development on it within six months. Absolutely delusional to think this project will hold any traction in 2020.

>>16325360
>Lmao can't believe I just spent 20 minutes reading all this bullshit for some shitcoin.
This is what we call an interesting thread. As opposed to "$1 EOY" white noise spam bullshit. Drama, conflict, humor, memes, you had it all. Why not buy more?

>>16093086
See you at 5 cents.

>>15968332
>>15968260
See you at 5 cents.

>Ask legitimate question
>Someone replies and tells me there are other use cases
>Accept that answer, ask what those use cases are that I'm unaware of
>HE IS FUDDING THIS GUY IS PATHETIC AND GOES TO BED AT MIDNIGHT
This is bordering on pathetic.

Let's see... Their website shows the Forbes logo, then when you click on it, it only takes you to the front page. Click on Nasdaq and it only talks about a "Chinese E-Commerce Giant" called JD which was a scam and shut down by the Chinese. Then you click on BitCoin Magazine and see it's the same article that was on Nasdaq, which means it's a copy pasted press kit and not actually covered by Nasdaq or Forbes on their own volition. This is done to give you the first impression big financial giants are talking about Devery and are on their radar.

No photos of the team members on the website nor a physical location of their office. Do they even have an office? Let me hand over my money and stock up on EVE so I can get exit scammed. Hard.

Only 2000 followers on Twitter, half of them are crypto moonboys, the other half are bots.

Now watch pajeets respond to this saying the website and social media doesn't matter... When you shit in the streets and beg random women for pics of bobs and vagene, it's no wonder. Now to anyone living in a first world country and who isn't autistic... image matters, as is social proof. And Devery doesn't have it, as much as it tries (and fails). And let's not forget: The CEO is a pajeet. Any more questions?

Let's see... Their website shows the Forbes logo, then when you click on it, it only takes you to the front page. Click on Nasdaq and it only talks about a "Chinese E-Commerce Giant" called JD which was a scam and shut down by the Chinese. Then you click on BitCoin Magazine and see it's the same article that was on Nasdaq, which means it's a copy pasted press kit and not actually covered by Nasdaq or Forbes on their own volition. This is done to give you the first impression big financial giants are talking about Devery and are on their radar.

No photos of the team members on the website nor a physical location of their office. Do they even have an office? Let me hand over my money and stock up on EVE so I can get exit scammed. Hard.

Only 2000 followers on Twitter, half of them are crypto moonboys, the other half are bots. Any more questions?

>>14679578
Let's see... Their website shows the Forbes logo, then when you click on it, it only takes you to the front page. Click on Nasdaq and it only talks about a "Chinese E-Commerce Giant" called JD which by your own admission was a scam and shut down by the Chinese (>>14679732 >>14679782). Then you click on BitCoin Magazine and see it's the same article that was on Nasdaq, which means it's a copy pasted press kit and not actually covered by Nasdaq or Forbes on their own volition. This is done to give you the first impression big financial giants are talking about Devery and are on their radar.

No photos of the team members on the website nor a physical location of their office. Do they even have an office? Let me hand over my money and stock up on EVE so I can get exit scammed. Hard.

Only 2000 followers on Twitter, half of them are crypto moonboys, the other half are bots. Any more questions?

>>14679627
>>14679741
Nice "subtle" shills. We're not pumping your EVE bags.

>>14312920
>banned
>pay with crypto
>banned

>>14239099
>not ludicrous +

>>13695500
>no Lition
>chad

>>13614200
larping faggot. 900 payment on 324k house means 0% interest. kys

>>13566881
>trying this hard

>no STO platform

>>13445718
>LTO
>nice

>LIT
>cash grab

>goes up
scam
>goes down
scam

>Log into binance
>Have to enter SMS Authentication code
>Fine, send SMS to my phone
>Receive it, enter it
>"We recognize you are signing in from a new device..."
>No I'm not
>have to click a link in a verification email
>"You have successfully verified. Log in here..."
>Try to log in again
>Have to enter SMS code again
>"You have to wait 1 minute before sending another SMS code. Blocked"
A tad bit excessive, isn't it? If a criminal already has access to my phone once, and then my email, what good is it going to do making him enter a code again and wait one minute?

Why can't you fire someone for going on strike? You pay them to do something, and then they don't do it. How is that acceptable?

Any delivery jobs that don't require you to prove you have insurance?

DoorDash didn't make me prove it. Any others?