[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance

Search:

View post   
>> No.30303319 [View]
File: 47 KB, 535x500, NFTards.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
30303319

>>30301417
You're right, they're not "just images" since they're not even images
They're just tokens with an imaginary link to images

The tech is good, but the current state of NFT "art" is gay bubble and massive top signal

>> No.30295800 [View]
File: 47 KB, 535x500, NFTards.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
30295800

>>30295661
>paying for certificate of ownership of unownable asset
Literal "I have a bridge to sell you" scam

>> No.30291822 [View]
File: 47 KB, 535x500, NFTards.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
30291822

>>30291453
Literally all they need to do is provide the token owner with some kind of unique access to the art, but they're stuck on "no muh token is a unique JPEG" stage of retardation
Paying real money for useless digital assets is not new, just ask WoW players - but their useless digital assets did SOMETHING

>> No.30288645 [View]
File: 47 KB, 535x500, NFTards.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
30288645

>>30288101
No, none of it is valuable. The PNG (the art) is infinitely reproducible and therefore valueless, whereas the token is just a token
And more importantly the art was not "tokenized"
The only link between the art and the token exists in your head because someone running a centralized for-profit exchange lied to you

What you actually have is cryptographically-secure Good Boy Points from the artist, which if the definition of fake and gay

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]