/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>24769031
4

>>20063640
>1 link will be worth $250 if it follows ETH path.

It’s either going to be way above this or peak at a mundane price. Nobody ever calls tops accurately

>>16559896

>tfw placed a buy order for eth on gdax in the summer of ‘16 that never went through and completely forgot about crypto until may of this year
JUST

>Had the choice between spending $900 to repair my piece of shit car and buying Ethereum in 2015
Guess what I did?

>>12957109

Unironically, when you look at all the crypto projects out there currently and what they have in the pipeline, selling QNT is by far one of the stupidest things you can do.

It still has the actual adoption coming up, and the news to date, while beneficial, was never claimed to be the adoption by enterprise customers. That was always Q2 and Q3. Nothing has changed.

It's so obvious what's going to happen next. Seen it so many times before. The paranoid will sell and bring QNT down to a more attractive entry point, and then eventually the real adoption will appear and start a new pump far larger than any others before.

Remember the tokenomics. QNT pumps don't just need news alone. If real adoption happens (which I believe it will, but each to their own), there will be buy pressure to get into QNT for the intrinsic token value appreciation which creates a snowball effect.

DYOR, and always remember just how retarded Biz fud can be.

https://vocaroo.com/i/s06dXK6DRb2I

It baffles me how financially illiterate most of this board is.