/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>58064180
Push the button, Frank.

>>57937774
You're always so angry about people who meme on the fed. If you were a real stacker (and not a fed shill) you wouldn't have a problem with people enjoying metals and memes.

>>57774472
Exceptionally true words. Was this one of yours? I saved it from an earlier thread into my "guns of pmg" folder. There's just something about guns and treasure that gives me big pirate/explorer/adventurer vibes.

>>57733504
Rika knows precious metal.

>>57573673
Nice revolvalizer, fren.

>>55260380
Glad to be of service, Fren!

Filter and stack. Stack and filter. This is how you build a community and generational wealth.

>>54680566
Done. It's great when the bots and fuds post early in a thread.

>>53623283
I think I prefer to stay right here and point out why you are wrong. Here it is: you are projecting your collector value structure into an hypothetical monetary market. Remember (or learn it now for the first time) that one of the reasons gold and silver have always been money is because they are FUNGIBLE (look it up). Every atom of gold and silver is identical to every other. This is why the mass of the metal in specie has always been the central matter in evaluation. Newton didn't flay the coin clippers because they were harming the aesthetic value of the coins or obscuring their brand name. Jefferson didn't care a coin scale because he was interested in the aesthetics. When gold and silver are remonetized, it will be in part because of their natural fungibility. As long as you stick to a situation where silver coins are being traded for collector value, you might have a point about your ASEs. But as soon as you stray into a situation of remonetization - which is what you did in your hypo - you are dead wrong.

I happen to like the aesthetics of the ASE. I own a few myself. But I'm not emotionally attached to the idea that they are in some way inherently worth more than their silver content.

>>53458321
WWIII is already in progress. It just doesn't look like WWI or WWII. WWIII is being fought in trade, in finance, in covert ops, in cyber attacks, and in hot proxies. Expect that to continue. The USA will not be nuking the BRICS.

>>52788480
You are the one who picked a listing to make your point and the only point it made was that people sell honestly described replicas of ASEs on ebay. I'm not saying there isn't fraud, but your example is not fraud.

>>52523179
Remember what is always valuable.

>>52280492
Hahaha! Anon blaster your fud out of the water and you are such a child you can't admit it.

>>51560249
Okay, so actually NOT a Jew. And I'M the autist? I think perhaps the folks who have Jews living under their beds are the autists. But then maybe I'm the Jew.

>>51438378
Hey! You stealing my girl?

>>51264302
Hehehe! That's the spirit, Fren!

>>50569580
No, I am expressly saying that it is hard to make such a prediction. We can put some reliance on Taleb's maxim that things that have been useful for a long time will probably continue to be useful. Silver and gold both have deep support there. Platinum not nearly as much. But platinum has unique properties that could very easily play a role in game-changing energy technologies. So IF somebody has already secured a good stack of silver and gold, it is not at all irrational to diversify. Silver, gold, platinum, pauladium, telurium, etc. all have different prospects.

>>50467872
Hello!