/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>57210487
>quickly shift the goalposts
All of my points still stand as they are, he just provided context, 1. no contacts, 2. not sharded, 3. upper limit on scaling - just because it's 10x more with simple transactions doesn't mean it has no limit. Illiterate anon, seek help.
>>57208135
The fact you know about raiblocks yet think kaspa is a good idea is strange. With all due respect you should grow up and out of the idea that the world needs a payment coin that isn't monero. Scalable L1s with contracts will replace the job of a payment coin with a public ledger, perhaps a zk-private L2 on top of whatever base layer of the future will replace xmr, but that's speculation.
The world doesn't even need another smart contract DAG based L1 so even if kasapa was useful, it would still be useless.

>>57208758
Snowblossom doesn't scale, It's a naive implementation of sharding, hence why it was so difficult to implement for every project that doesn't solve how to scale up referencing the headers of each block on each shard.
>>57209312
Speed is not part of the trilemma.
>>57210618
>Large mining pools can game the system by crafting blocks that make it more likely for them to win the next block as well
A selfish mining attack?
Here is a paper on how it's not a real issue on the only truly sharded PoW chain currently in operation https://www.researchgate.net/publication/362952389_An_Analytical_Study_of_Selfish_Mining_Attacks_on_Chainweb_Blockchain

>>57209160
I don't, obviously. Other L1s I hold are TIA and MINA

>>56755047
You wanna know about Kadena, huh? It's not just another blockchain. This is next-level stuff
Kadena's using Chainweb. Picture this: instead of one blockchain, you've got a network of chains, all interlinked. It's like a spiderweb, man. This setup spreads out the workload, keeps things running smooth and fast. It's about sharding the ledger state, but in a decentralized way. Everyone's been scratching their heads over this for years, and Kadena's here swinging for the fences.
And get this – they're sticking with Proof-of-Work, but not the way Bitcoin does it. They've jazzed it up, made it more efficient. It's like having a big-block V8 running on regular gas with the mileage of a compact. They're proving you don't need to shift to Proof-of-Stake to fix your problems.
Now, about this trilemma – decentralization, security, scalability – Kadena's aiming to knock all three out of the park. They're not just solving the scaling issue; they're doing it without selling out on decentralization.
And yeah, they're going for horizontal scaling. Think big, man. Like, really big. They've built up a system that can grow, add more chains, increase throughput, without turning into a monster that no one can handle. This ain't your typical "let's just make the blocks bigger" solution. It's more nuanced, more refined.
But here’s the thing – it's not just about having fancy new technology. It's about making it work in the real world. They've got to prove that this isn't just some flash-in-the-pan, high-concept tech that nobody can use. They're playing a long game here, looking to change the whole landscape.
So, that's the deal with Kadena. It's ambitious, it's high-tech, and it's trying to solve the problems that have had crypto folks pulling their hair out for years. If more people hear about it, it's gonna change the game. But as always, the proof is in the pudding. Check this out. An example of Chainweb scaling from 10 to 20 shards, in production.
Never seen shit like that

>>55803368
>a network of chains went from 10 to 20 in production
probably nothing

>>55465920
I get it, I'm just saying there are more variables that are less predictable with a higher impact on your baggies

>>53115585
>KDA is a failure and irrelevant in the long term. It did less than doge, a literal meme dog.
Based and webm is made up.