/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>56516204
Thanks for the pop culture update, zoomie, last I knew snowflake described the kind of person who'd use TikTok actually but I clearly don't have my finger on the pulse of such critically important distinctions like you do.

>>56516254
I rate LINK's fundamentals higher than anything. My original point was in response to the suggestion $100 is a "virtual certainty". It is very interesting as triple figs was considered a lock in 2020 after the August run too. That was 3 years ago. I pointed out that actually it would constitute, as you put it yourself, "something special". You can point to ETH per usual as the blue sky benchmark, but the point is you're pointing to exceptions to describe something you all speak about in certainty. The implication of that is interesting as it really implies this a critical time for LINK and even in the ranks of the faithful this cycle is all or nothing, whether you meant to admit it or not. You're saying it is going to perform exceptionally because it is exceptional. If it doesn't, that means it isn't exceptional, but I doubt any of you would have the ability to admit that if it happened. You run out of comparisons after ETH. You're on your last one. I think that's worth pointing out in these echo chamber threads, yes.

And while there might not be any unbreakable laws of physics here, discounting all history and data because of that is a just a dumb move if you're someone building an actual strategy for a cycle. Expectations should be relative as that's the entire game of trading and investment. As I said, if LINK doesn't pull it off, you begin to run out of excuses to keep saying it's exceptional. If it does, LINK's untouchable. If LINK hits $100 it should be blasted across the whole fucking industry. I wouldn't play it off as a certainty. But as I said, the market is retarded.

>>54652700
>>54652944
>>54653077
>>54653099
>>54653822
>>54653866
Jesus fucking christ
Checked
What a run